On 2/12/11 09:52 AM, Andy Lubel wrote:
It's 100% Dell at this point. I haven't called them because I'm
guessing they don't speak Solaris and I can't reproduce the behavior
on any of the supported OS'. I'll try nonetheless and see what
happens.
Rather than return the drives/system I was thinking
During the diagnostics of my SAN failure last week we thought we had seen a
backplane failure due to high error counts with 'lsiutil'. However, even with
a new backplane and ruling out failed cards (MPXIO or singular) or bad cables
I'm still seeing my error count with LSIUTIL increment. I've
Ok, so I changed the -vnc to so use an outside world accessible ip:
-vnc :01
And now I connect. So it looks like it was ssh. But oddly, when I use
netcat to create a server, I can tunnel to it just fine:
netcat -l localhost 5901
^ works fine with ssh tunnel.
This moves me forward, but I really
It's 100% Dell at this point. I haven't called them because I'm guessing they
don't speak Solaris and I can't reproduce the behavior on any of the supported
OS'. I'll try nonetheless and see what happens.
Rather than return the drives/system I was thinking of getting the h700i and
just doing j
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Rich wrote:
> If you got them from Dell, talk to Dell about them misbehaving.
>
> If you didn't, then I have even fewer constructive ideas.
>
If you didn't that may be the problem. Dell got tired of people loading
their servers up with 3rd party drives and then c
Hi,
I've got Ubuntu booting under kvm and now I'm trying to vnc into it in
order to install it. I've got an ssh tunnel going through to
localhost:5901 which the kvm-qemu vnc server seems to be listening on,
ie the port opens with telnet. When I try to connect to the vm with
vnc no window comes up
If you bought them with your personal American express card you have ninety
days to retun most items.
Have you tried verifying the link speed and/or locking the speed to 6Gb/s?
j.
-Original Message-
From: Rich [mailto:rerc...@acm.jhu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:17 PM
To:
If you got them from Dell, talk to Dell about them misbehaving.
If you didn't, then I have even fewer constructive ideas.
- Rich
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Andy Lubel wrote:
> Yeah, its the drives.. whipped out a Hitachi 2TB SATA 3gbps drive and
> plugged it in and it looks good.
>
> looks
Yeah, its the drives.. whipped out a Hitachi 2TB SATA 3gbps drive and
plugged it in and it looks good.
looks like my problem is the ST2000NM001 - 6gbps SAS2 2TB. Problem is that
I have 20 of these. I wonder what I should do now..
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Rich wrote:
> I'm guessing it ha
On 12/1/2011 3:15 PM, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Geoff Flaritywrote:
My advice would be to max out your RAM (for ARC) before you bother
with a ZIL, or L2ARC. Where a fast SSD for a ZIL really shines is
random synchronized writes. IE a database transaction. You'll not
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Geoff Flarity wrote:
> My advice would be to max out your RAM (for ARC) before you bother
> with a ZIL, or L2ARC. Where a fast SSD for a ZIL really shines is
> random synchronized writes. IE a database transaction. You'll notice
> this when you run filebench and lo
I've used filebench on solaris 10 for testing different disk
combinations for a database servers a head of a major purchase. I had
to write my own graphing scripts, but the information was very
informative.
My advice would be to max out your RAM (for ARC) before you bother
with a ZIL, or L2ARC.
On 11/30/2011 04:04 PM, Geoff Flarity wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:59 AM, carlopmart wrote:
On 11/30/2011 03:51 PM, Geoff Flarity wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:48 AM, carlopmartwrote:
Hi all,
Somebody have tried to install OI 151a under rhel6.x kvm hosts?? Works
well?? how ab
I'm in the process of setting up a fileserver running oi_151a. How
can I determine the performance improvement from adding log and cache
devices? I'm using filebench with the fileserver personality. Is
that my best choice? So far, I've tried filebench directly on the
server and also on an NFS c
On 1/12/11 07:28 PM, Chris Bünger wrote:
Experienced the same problem, yesterday. It worked before.
Chris
Am 01.12.2011 um 10:20 schrieb Michael McDonnell:
Noticed this yesterday evening and see it's still in effect now.
Attempting a search in the Package Manager or via terminal fails.
$ p
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:20, Michael McDonnell wrote:
> Noticed this yesterday evening and see it's still in effect now.
> Attempting a search in the Package Manager or via terminal fails.
>
> $ pkg search randr
> pkg: Some repositories failed to respond appropriately:
> openindiana.org:
> http p
Experienced the same problem, yesterday. It worked before.
Chris
Am 01.12.2011 um 10:20 schrieb Michael McDonnell :
> Noticed this yesterday evening and see it's still in effect now.
> Attempting a search in the Package Manager or via terminal fails.
>
> $ pkg search randr
> pkg: Some repositori
Noticed this yesterday evening and see it's still in effect now.
Attempting a search in the Package Manager or via terminal fails.
$ pkg search randr
pkg: Some repositories failed to respond appropriately:
openindiana.org:
http protocol error: code: 503 reason: Service Unavailable
URL:
'http://p
18 matches
Mail list logo
