Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] apache on 151 svcadm?

2011-07-17 Thread Daniel Kjar
never mind... svcadm enable apache22 Why can't we just keep things parallel? What good does this serve calling the package one thing then using another name to enable it? Would it be soo difficult to not do that in the future? On 7/17/2011 4:44 PM, Daniel Kjar wrote: Hi All... just did

[OpenIndiana-discuss] apache on 151 svcadm?

2011-07-17 Thread Daniel Kjar
Hi All... just did the old pkg install apache-22 for 151 and I know it has been ages since I set up my workstation but how do I get apache into the whole svcadm enable scheme? I thought that would happen automagically with the pkg install Dan ___

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Shorter subjects for mailing lists

2011-07-17 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
On 2011-07-17 10:47, Nikola M wrote: What do you think? I'd be surprised if anybody dealing with the level of mailing list traffic that paying attention to several open source projects requires is just dumping all their mail into one box. If they're already sorting things, either through

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] rsync problems: out of memory

2011-07-17 Thread Frank Van Damme
2011/7/16 Gregory Youngblood : >> Which means: forget about using openindiana instead of Nexenta for backups. > > It would be interesting to find what the difference is between them. I'm re-trying with OI 148 (stable) and it seems not to have this problems (at least it's been going for a few hours

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Shorter subjects for mailing lists

2011-07-17 Thread Nikola M
Sriram Narayanan wrote: > Just [oi] sounds good - it'll let us identify mails visually, though > having said that, I now wonder how important that is. > > On Gmail on my Blackberry, I'm able to see the entire subject line, > but my responses come through as top-posts :( > > -- Sriram > > On 7/13/11

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] zpool in sorry state

2011-07-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 04:11 AM, Mark wrote: On 14/07/2011 2:44 a.m., Christopher Chan wrote: On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote: Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas? No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver ___

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ntpd not keeping time in sync

2011-07-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 04:38 PM, Mark wrote: On 14/07/2011 11:54 a.m., Gary wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Mark wrote: The 500ppm ntp range limit is easy to exceed with virtual hardware, since it isn't "real time" orientated. The original poster, Chris Chan, is running it on bar