never mind... svcadm enable apache22
Why can't we just keep things parallel? What good does this serve
calling the package one thing then using another name to enable it?
Would it be soo difficult to not do that in the future?
On 7/17/2011 4:44 PM, Daniel Kjar wrote:
Hi All... just did
Hi All... just did the old pkg install apache-22 for 151 and I know it
has been ages since I set up my workstation but how do I get apache into
the whole svcadm enable scheme? I thought that would happen
automagically with the pkg install
Dan
___
On 2011-07-17 10:47, Nikola M wrote:
What do you think?
I'd be surprised if anybody dealing with the level of mailing list
traffic that paying attention to several open source projects requires
is just dumping all their mail into one box.
If they're already sorting things, either through
2011/7/16 Gregory Youngblood :
>> Which means: forget about using openindiana instead of Nexenta for backups.
>
> It would be interesting to find what the difference is between them.
I'm re-trying with OI 148 (stable) and it seems not to have this
problems (at least it's been going for a few hours
Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> Just [oi] sounds good - it'll let us identify mails visually, though
> having said that, I now wonder how important that is.
>
> On Gmail on my Blackberry, I'm able to see the entire subject line,
> but my responses come through as top-posts :(
>
> -- Sriram
>
> On 7/13/11
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 04:11 AM, Mark wrote:
On 14/07/2011 2:44 a.m., Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:28 PM, Eric Pierce wrote:
Is the 9211-8i a different driver than mpt_sas?
No it is not. LSI 2008 chip - mpt_sas driver
___
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 04:38 PM, Mark wrote:
On 14/07/2011 11:54 a.m., Gary wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Mark wrote:
The 500ppm ntp range limit is easy to exceed with virtual hardware,
since it
isn't "real time" orientated.
The original poster, Chris Chan, is running it on bar