We're moving to 9211-8i - so far no such problems with those. Exporting and
reimporting the pool shouldn't be a problem.
roy
- Original Message -
> Also, would it be possible to just export the pool, install the new
> HBA, and
> re-import the pool or is that asking too much? :)
>
> On T
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:54 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 06:52 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 03:51 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Sigh...
ntpdate -u 192.168.9.1
10 Jul 09:01:15 ntpdate[29929]: step time server 192.168.9.1 offset
3317.
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 06:52 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 03:51 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Sigh...
ntpdate -u 192.168.9.1
10 Jul 09:01:15 ntpdate[29929]: step time server 192.168.9.1 offset
3317.946738 sec
IIRC ntpd won't adjust the time if the difference
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:13 AM, Gary Driggs wrote:
On Jul 12, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
I have switched from broadcastclient to specifying 5 time servers. That seems
to have got it to behave properly.
That isn't a default setting in OI, is it? If so, I'd strongly advise
On Jul 12, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> I have switched from broadcastclient to specifying 5 time servers. That seems
> to have got it to behave properly.
That isn't a default setting in OI, is it? If so, I'd strongly advise against
it. In fact, I advise against using it at all s
Also, would it be possible to just export the pool, install the new HBA, and
re-import the pool or is that asking too much? :)
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Eric Pierce wrote:
> Is it functionally different if I don't even bother with the raid crap on
> it, or should I change the firmware any
Is it functionally different if I don't even bother with the raid crap on
it, or should I change the firmware anyway?
The LSI controller is built into the motherboard of the supermicro server we
have. Do you have a recommendation for a better SAS HBA?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Roy Sigurd
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Ron Dawson wrote:
> The main reason I can see for allowing anonymous comments is because not
> everyone has an account and they'd still like to contribute feedback to
> things such as the HCL portions of the wiki. Yes, there is a process for
> requesting accounts,
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 03:51 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Sigh...
ntpdate -u 192.168.9.1
10 Jul 09:01:15 ntpdate[29929]: step time server 192.168.9.1 offset
3317.946738 sec
IIRC ntpd won't adjust the time if the difference is too big, measured between
the system clock, inherited from
On Jul 12, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>> Yes, it is really an issue. Trying to make sense of mailing list
>> subjects on my phone, for instance, is a bit tiresome.
>
> I guess most phones should allow for a little longer subjects than that these
> days. For instance, my phone
The main reason I can see for allowing anonymous comments is because not
everyone has an account and they'd still like to contribute feedback to
things such as the HCL portions of the wiki. Yes, there is a process for
requesting accounts, but in my own experience I never got a response back so
gav
> Seems we were being hit by a spambot for the last two days,
> thanks for the pointer. I've deleted the spam comments and
> somebody else already seems to have enabled CAPTCHAS for
> anonymous comments. If this isn't sufficient I guess we have to
> restrict commenting to logged in users.
There ar
I guess that's the one with the mpt driver, which sucks rather badly. I'm
seeing rather bad issues with that/those driver/cards on severa machines. The
fix was to move to LSI 92xx boards.
roy
- Original Message -
> Can anyone who has used SAS controller LSI 3442-E-R please let me know
>
And by the way, the IR firmware is the 'raid' firmware, supporting mirrors.
Better use the IT firmware for ZFS
roy
- Original Message -
> It's an LSI2008-IR. Same thing or different? It's a SAS controller, no
> RAID.
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> wrote:
>
>
I don't know that one. The chipset on 3801/3081 is LSI-1068, and the driver is
'mpt'. I've seen serious issues with those...
roy
- Original Message -
> It's an LSI2008-IR. Same thing or different? It's a SAS controller, no
> RAID.
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> Sigh...
>
> ntpdate -u 192.168.9.1
> 10 Jul 09:01:15 ntpdate[29929]: step time server 192.168.9.1 offset
> 3317.946738 sec
IIRC ntpd won't adjust the time if the difference is too big, measured between
the system clock, inherited from the hardware clock, and the ntp servers. I've
see this on
> Yes, it is really an issue. Trying to make sense of mailing list
> subjects on my phone, for instance, is a bit tiresome.
I guess most phones should allow for a little longer subjects than that these
days. For instance, my phone shows, for a particular email (bug post)
[Illumos gate - Bug #119
On 06/24/11 10:21, Andrey N. Oktyabrski wrote:
> Where I can get the latest (2.1 or 2.2-beta) version package for the
> OpenIndiana? I use 2.0b1 at the moment. It eats 3-4 times less memory
> than the Firefox+Thunderbird.
There is no compiled nor packaged Seamonkey for Solaris and OpenSolaris
based
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 02:00 PM, Gregory Youngblood wrote:
On Jul 11, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Joshua M. Clulow wrote:
On 2011-07-09 14:20, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
Most of us use GUI-based email readers that handle>80char subjects. Is
this really an issue?
Yes, it is really an issue. Trying
Thanks, Richard, that helped a little, but this is starting to look quite
tricky.
My system has three 2TB drives formatted , like so:
+---++
| rpool on c8t0d0s0 , 64 GB | zpool on c8t0d0p1 , 1.9TB | <- #1 mobo sata 1
+-
20 matches
Mail list logo
