Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Ken Gunderson
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 23:03 -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 19:58 -0700, Marion Hakanson wrote: > > What's wrong with just "illumos"? If you need to distinguish, just use > > "illumos, the kernel" or "illumos, OS/Net" vs "illumos, the distribution". > > The original "OpenSolari

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Blake Irvin
While in many ways I agree, I do find that 'Illumos' is hard for the uninitiated to 'hear right'. It's a little awkward to pronounce. I think it's best to throw up a collaborative document and after we collect a bunch of names take a poll. That would help give an idea of what people are think

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Ken Gunderson
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 19:58 -0700, Marion Hakanson wrote: > What's wrong with just "illumos"? If you need to distinguish, just use > "illumos, the kernel" or "illumos, OS/Net" vs "illumos, the distribution". > The original "OpenSolaris, the distribution" was based on "OpenSolaris, > the kernel", a

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread jaimef
BigRed Marion Hakanson wrote: >What's wrong with just "illumos"? If you need to distinguish, just use >"illumos, the kernel" or "illumos, OS/Net" vs "illumos, the distribution". >The original "OpenSolaris, the distribution" was based on "OpenSolaris, >the kernel", and other distributions based

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Illumos / OpenIndiana podcast

2011-06-20 Thread Benediktus Anindito
i didn't understand German :| On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Jamon Camisso wrote: > On 06/14/2011 04:51 AM, Dave Koelmeyer wrote: >> >> Garrett D'Amore has just posted a link to this: >> >> >> http://systemhelden.com/heldenfunk/2011/06/hf059-illumos-openindiana-niche11 >> >> Good listening, nic

[OpenIndiana-discuss] build ntfs-3g on oi_148 fail

2011-06-20 Thread Benediktus Anindito
i've try to build ntfs-3g on OpenIndiana build 148, based on a guide from this post http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2011-April/003644.html but the build was failing when i run `make` on ntfs-3g: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include/ntfs-3g -g -O2 -Wall -MT ntfsresize

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Marion Hakanson
What's wrong with just "illumos"? If you need to distinguish, just use "illumos, the kernel" or "illumos, OS/Net" vs "illumos, the distribution". The original "OpenSolaris, the distribution" was based on "OpenSolaris, the kernel", and other distributions based on "Opensolaris, the kernel" did exis

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Paul Gress
On 06/20/11 10:32 PM, Magnus wrote: On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Tim Aslat wrote: How about FlareOS (offshoot of the Sun) Mithros.org is available. I intentionally didn't capitalize the "os". It's less awkward to read and to pronounce. There are some tenuous connections between Mithras& Sol

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Magnus
On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Tim Aslat wrote: > > How about FlareOS (offshoot of the Sun) Mithros.org is available. I intentionally didn't capitalize the "os". It's less awkward to read and to pronounce. There are some tenuous connections between Mithras & Sol, the Sun God, in ancient Roman

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Tim Aslat
In the immortal words of Rob Shinn on 06/21/11 11:48: On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 21:11 -0400, Jake wrote: I totally agree. OpenIndiana describes the distro quite well, since it is the opensource bits of the Solaris Indiana release; but the reference is totally lost to anyone not familiar with what

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Rob Shinn
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 21:11 -0400, Jake wrote: > I totally agree. OpenIndiana describes the distro quite well, since it is the > opensource bits of the Solaris Indiana release; but the reference is totally > lost to anyone not familiar with what OpenSolaris was. > > I think a Sun reference woul

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Jamon Camisso
Too bad the names nixOS and Illumix are taken. Some celestial/mythical names: KoreOS - Kore being another name for Persephone. There might be a bit of a metaphorical parallel between her story and Solaris depending on how you look at it. But what do I know.. CorOS - based on the name of Cor Caro

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Magnus
On Jun 20, 2011, at 9:11 PM, Jake wrote: > EclipseOS maybe? http://www.eclipse.org/ might take exception. ;) ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Jake
I totally agree. OpenIndiana describes the distro quite well, since it is the opensource bits of the Solaris Indiana release; but the reference is totally lost to anyone not familiar with what OpenSolaris was. I think a Sun reference would be fitting. EclipseOS maybe? Can we put up a page

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] [Off topic?] SPARC Rules

2011-06-20 Thread Gary
SGI/Intel hope to catch up by 2018... http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/390749/sgi_intel_plan_speed_up_supercomputers_500_times_by_2018 ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Magnus
I've been reticent to say anything as a newcomer, but a six syllable name doesn't exactly roll off the tip of the tongue. Not to mention, any relevance to "Indiana" is probably lost upon a broader audience. "Open" is pretty played out as a prefix. The whole thing should be two, maybe three syl

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Albert Lee
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Blake wrote: > Does anyone besides me feel that we need a more unified naming/branding > approach for the community-driven descendants of OpenSolaris? I feel that > the there is no obvious connection (for those new to the platform) between > Illumos/OpenIndiana, wh

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Blake
:) Clearly this is the sort of thing that the OpenIndiana group must choose to do, if they agree. I'll reiterate - I love OpenIndiana, and I want it to be easily name-dropped and recognizable to even the hobbyist crowd. These are the folks who can help fix things in userland and the GUI. If we

[OpenIndiana-discuss] branding for illumos/openindiana

2011-06-20 Thread Blake
Does anyone besides me feel that we need a more unified naming/branding approach for the community-driven descendants of OpenSolaris? I feel that the there is no obvious connection (for those new to the platform) between Illumos/OpenIndiana, which I think is counterproductive given that OpenIndiana

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [illumos-Discuss] [Off topic?] SPARC Rules

2011-06-20 Thread Volker A. Brandt
Philip J. Robar writes: > Fujitsu's K Computer crowned supercomputer champ as petaflop age > emerges. The K Computer has 68,544 SPARC64 VIIIfx CPUs with eight cores = > 548,352 cores. And it runs Linux. Regards -- Volker -- ---

[OpenIndiana-discuss] [Off topic?] SPARC Rules

2011-06-20 Thread Philip J. Robar
Fujitsu's K Computer crowned supercomputer champ as petaflop age emerges. The K Computer has 68,544 SPARC64 VIIIfx CPUs with eight cores = 548,352 cores. It’s also notable that the K Computer doesn’t use graphics processors or accelerators. http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/japans-k-computer-takes-

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Setting up Samba 3.5.9

2011-06-20 Thread Gary Driggs
Are you trying to set up a domain controller? If not, you might consider using ZFS' built-in CIFS service; http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Using+OpenIndiana+as+a+storage+server#UsingOpenIndianaasastorageserver-CIFS%2FSMB ___ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Openindiana in VMWare and usb devices

2011-06-20 Thread Michael Stapleton
Maybe the output of: truss -t stat,open tip /dev/cua/0 will give us something to work with. Mike On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 12:54 +0200, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Hi, I had no trouble with usb devices on native openindiana installations. > Now I installed openindiana inside VMWare4.1 that supports

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ZFS / NFS & chown

2011-06-20 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Thanx! :) I'll check it asap :) -- Da: cwjorda...@cox.net A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Gabriele Bulfon Data: 20 giugno 2011 13.34.18 CEST Oggetto: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ZFS / NFS &chown Been a while since I've

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ZFS / NFS & chown

2011-06-20 Thread cwjordanoi
Been a while since I've done this, looks like there is a better way, you want to set the "root=" option, like: pfexec zfs set sharenfs='rw=192.168.1.0/24,root=192.168.1.30/32' tank/share (from http://allanfeid.com/content/ultimate-file-server-opensolaris-and-zfs) Also see share_nfs(1M) which sa

[OpenIndiana-discuss] Openindiana in VMWare and usb devices

2011-06-20 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Hi, I had no trouble with usb devices on native openindiana installations. Now I installed openindiana inside VMWare4.1 that supports USB devices, and infact they work correctly with Linux guests. On a virtualized Openindiana, I can attach usb keys, and see them correctly. I then attached an USB C

[OpenIndiana-discuss] (no subject)

2011-06-20 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Hi, I had no trouble with usb devices on native openindiana installations. Now I installed openindiana inside VMWare4.1 that supports USB devices, and infact they work correctly with Linux guests. On a virtualized Openindiana, I can attach usb keys, and see them correctly. I then attached an USB C

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ZFS / NFS & chown

2011-06-20 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Maybe. Should I -maproot to the storage root? But, again, root is a role in openindiana...will it work? -- Da: cwjorda...@cox.net A: Discussion list for OpenIndiana Cc: Gabriele Bulfon Data: 19 giugno 2011 13.27.23 CEST

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Setting up Samba 3.5.9

2011-06-20 Thread Jonathan Adams
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/SWAT.html According to this it should be possible to run the swat in demo mode by specifying the "-a" flag ... although this isn't advised in production ... you should then be able to modify the config and specify the allowed hosts and th