Hi Dave,
What are the output of "zfs list" on both machines? I think you have to create
the "myzone" ZFS dataset on machine 2 before attaching the zone to it.
Regards,
Okky Hendriansyah
-Original Message-
From: Dave Koelmeyer
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 06:03:41
To: Discussion list for Ope
Hi,
I'm having a hell of a time trying to simply migrate a zone from one OI machine
to another, wondering if anyone can help. Both machines are running oi_147
I have configured and install a NGZ on machine 1, and wish to detach and
install it on machine 2.
I am following the guide here:
http
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 10:54 AM, Allan Echavia Registos wrote:
Kumusta Christopher:
Mabuti, ikaw?
On 5/25/2011 8:28 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:20 AM, Allan E. Registos wrote:
+1.
Be friendly to Linux users(me a Linux user), as these are the people
that wi
Kumusta Christopher:
On 5/25/2011 8:28 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:20 AM, Allan E. Registos wrote:
+1.
Be friendly to Linux users(me a Linux user), as these are the people
that will often convert to BSD and Solaris/OI. I think most
enterprise data centers nowaday
> > I just attended this HTC conference and had a chat with a guy from
> > UiO (university of oslo) about ZFS. He claimed Solaris/OI will die
> > silently if a single pool fails. I have seen similar earlier, then
> > due to a bug in ZFS (two drives lost in a RAIDz2, spares taking
> > over, resilver
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 08:20 AM, Allan E. Registos wrote:
+1.
Be friendly to Linux users(me a Linux user), as these are the people that will
often convert to BSD and Solaris/OI. I think most enterprise data centers
nowadays are a hive of heterogeneous technologies.
I came from Linux ove
+1.
Be friendly to Linux users(me a Linux user), as these are the people that will
often convert to BSD and Solaris/OI. I think most enterprise data centers
nowadays are a hive of heterogeneous technologies.
Regards,
Allan
- Original Message -
From: "Alasdair Lumsden"
To: "Discus
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 03:41 AM, LinuxBSDos.com wrote:
One of the thought forms floating in the ethers is UNIX/Linux is difficult
to use. Even people who have never used it, believe it. Months ago, I went
to fix my car and decided to bring a book to kill time with while I
waited. It just happ
>
>From: "Ken Gunderson"
>To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
>Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 8:16:40 PM
>Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Update info?
>
>The presumption that something is the best based on distrowatch listing
>is a fallacy.
>
Kenderson: For the record, I did not s
I'm glad we are discussing our appeal (or lack of it) to devs. I don't care
so much about the specifics of how we stay sexy, just that we do it.
If you work with developers who haven't grown up on Solaris, ask them to try
it and see how they like it :) We can improve.
Ok - back to work
On
I'm about to expand my storage from 2 drives in a mirror to 4 drives (2 x
mirrors concatenated). After this stage 3 of my 4 drives will be Advanced
format drives, so I'm looking at the zpool with block-size 4096 (ashift=9).
I will have the opportunity here to format the new drives using the 4096
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:56 +0100, Deano wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This OI meeting was dominated by one topic 151 and the road to stable! My
> write up /synopsis of the OI meeting is at
>
>
>
> http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi-meeting+24th+May+2011
>
>
>
> Hope that is interesting and if an
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Presumably there's a balance with this, as with most things.
>
> But giving in is not without costs. Making the quarterly look good often
> leaves one out of position for the long haul.
>
> Maybe one could do both. Use familiarity to
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 18:50 -0400, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Presumably there's a balance with this, as with most things.
>
> But giving in is not without costs. Making the quarterly look good often
> leaves one out of position for the long haul.
Peter F. Drucker, widely acknowledged as the
Hi,
This OI meeting was dominated by one topic 151 and the road to stable! My
write up /synopsis of the OI meeting is at
http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/oi-meeting+24th+May+2011
Hope that is interesting and if anybody in the meeting notices any mistakes,
let me know and I'll get them fix
Has anyone compiled this under OI yet? Just curious if anyone has had
any feedback on the process as I'm looking to move away from
OpenOffice.org on a couple of platforms.
thanks,
Gary
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana
Presumably there's a balance with this, as with most things.
But giving in is not without costs. Making the quarterly look good often
leaves one out of position for the long haul.
Maybe one could do both. Use familiarity tools, but _only_ as a temporary
measure, while concurrently encouraging
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Blake wrote:
> I certainly understand your point of view, Richard. Unfortunately, fewer
> developers nowadays understand systems, and that's not likely to improve.
>
> My point is more that tool choice in business is driven by opportunity cost
> and the bottom lin
I certainly understand your point of view, Richard. Unfortunately, fewer
developers nowadays understand systems, and that's not likely to improve.
My point is more that tool choice in business is driven by opportunity cost
and the bottom line. If I have to spend an extra two weeks training devs
On May 24, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Blake Irvin wrote:
> As a longtime Solaris user I don't have to be convinced that it's better in
> many ways than Linux. But there is a reality that I've been forced to
> embrace - developers don't care.
>
> I'm in the process right now of helping a large develop
One of the thought forms floating in the ethers is UNIX/Linux is difficult
to use. Even people who have never used it, believe it. Months ago, I went
to fix my car and decided to bring a book to kill time with while I
waited. It just happened to be a book on Linux.
A mechanic saw me reading it and
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 00:22 +0600, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote:
> > I think Debian is a very nice Linux distro.
>
> Many OpenSolaris/OI users share this feeling - this is because
> OpenSolaris has (kind of) inherited it's look and feel from Debian -
> thanks to Ian Murdock.
>
> My personal favorit
Just a little insight on the behavior of human race that i experienced at
home:
I had a laptop with Windows XP Home with Office XP that crashed at one day.
I had used the installer partition for something else, so I installed
OpenSolaris instead.
My family (wife and kids) cried several days that
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote:
>> I think Debian is a very nice Linux distro.
>
> Many OpenSolaris/OI users share this feeling - this is because OpenSolaris
> has (kind of) inherited it's look and feel from Debian - thanks to Ian
> Murdock.
>
Ian served mostly as a co
man zpool /failmode
-Albert
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just attended this HTC conference and had a chat with a guy from UiO
> (university of oslo) about ZFS. He claimed Solaris/OI will die silently if a
> single pool fails. I have seen similar
> I think Debian is a very nice Linux distro.
Many OpenSolaris/OI users share this feeling - this is because
OpenSolaris has (kind of) inherited it's look and feel from Debian -
thanks to Ian Murdock.
My personal favorite in Debian is System -> Administration -> Services.
Nice and simple.
> I could go on and list all the features I wish to see on a perfect
> operating system, but I do not think that is what this thread was
intended
> for.
Please list them :)
I think that here is the appropriate place for a discussion on what the
perfect operating system should be. We all want t
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 12:05 -0400, Gary Gendel wrote:
> I tried to upgrade with the following command:
>
> pkg image-update --accept --be-name snv_151 --require-new-be
>
> but it got hung. I tried it several times with the same result:
>
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FI
Hi all
I just attended this HTC conference and had a chat with a guy from UiO
(university of oslo) about ZFS. He claimed Solaris/OI will die silently if a
single pool fails. I have seen similar earlier, then due to a bug in ZFS (two
drives lost in a RAIDz2, spares taking over, resilvering and t
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 12:05 -0400, Gary Gendel wrote:
> I tried to upgrade with the following command:
>
> pkg image-update --accept --be-name snv_151 --require-new-be
>
> but it got hung. I tried it several times with the same result:
>
> DOWNLOAD PKGS FI
On 05/24/11 01:44 AM, LinuxBSDos.com wrote:
>
> At least 99.99% of all the distros ship with sudo installed, and yes, a
> few make it easy, when creating a user account, to add it to the
> administrative group (the wheel group). That, in my opinion, is how it
> should be done. That is how we all u
As a longtime Solaris user I don't have to be convinced that it's better in
many ways than Linux. But there is a reality that I've been forced to embrace
- developers don't care.
I'm in the process right now of helping a large development team make the
transition to a Solaris hosting solution.
I tried to upgrade with the following command:
pkg image-update --accept --be-name snv_151 --require-new-be
but it got hung. I tried it several times with the same result:
DOWNLOAD PKGS FILESXFER (MB)
mail/thunderbird/plugin/thunderbir... 206/878 2
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:06 -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
> On 05/24/11 08:54 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:26:33AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 09:21 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I too don't appreciate the flamewar on here of
> Unix-like OS cover a wide range from OI to Os X to Solaris to Linux to BSD
> to Linux and tbh I rather we chose the most portable version skill wise so
> we can easily tempt people to try OI and hopefully enjoy and see what's
> good about our favorite little bit of OS space.
>
> It's pretty obvi
On 05/24/11 08:54 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:26:33AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 09:21 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi All,
I too don't appreciate the flamewar on here of Solaris vs Linux,
sudo vs pfexec.
With all due respect, I think the technic
I haven't ever understood the term "SUDO". They told me it stands for "Super
User DO", but if I searched the usergroups and usernames on the OS there was
no SUPERUSER to find anywhere.
There is basically only 1 admin or root account that can and may control the
whole OS. The way the admin is trea
Found some further background reading from security-discuss@ for anyone looking
for further technical background info:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=98824
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=98824&tstart=210
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=98729&ts
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 13:33 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> On 24 May 2011, at 13:10, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> > Especially when that distro is loosing respect from those who actually
> > have a clue or two due to continued track record of bugs that result in
> > very unreliable platform choice for
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:26:33AM -0600, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 09:21 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I too don't appreciate the flamewar on here of Solaris vs Linux,
> > sudo vs pfexec.
>
> With all due respect, I think the technical signal is high enoug
Hi, Albert.
I checked my cpu with kstat. But my cpu family is 15.
Therefore I didn't use the built-in powernow function.
This means I can't use PowerNow! function on OI.
Is it right?
Ryo
On 2011/05/24, at 10:17, Albert Lee wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:29 PM, 村川 了 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
On 24 May 2011, at 13:10, Ken Gunderson wrote:
> Especially when that distro is loosing respect from those who actually
> have a clue or two due to continued track record of bugs that result in
> very unreliable platform choice for the server room.
Inflammatory and arrogant comments like this are
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 09:21 +0100, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I too don't appreciate the flamewar on here of Solaris vs Linux, sudo vs
> pfexec.
With all due respect, I think the technical signal is high enough to
qualify as relevant discussion.
> If you don't like sudo, you don't ha
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:29 +0800, Allan E. Registos wrote:
>
> >
> >From: "LinuxBSDos.com"
> >
> >How many of those distros that are not based on Ubuntu can you name?
> >
> >Remember that we are talking about using sudo instead of the root account
> >system, not just having sudo installed
On 5/24/11 8:08 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 01:11 -0700, Gary Driggs wrote:
On May 24, 2011, at 12:36 AM, "LinuxBSDos.com" wrote:
List as many as you can and I'll still be able to prove that "most of the
distros using sudo are derived from Ubuntu" is a statement of fact.
Op
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 02:44 -0600, LinuxBSDos.com wrote:
> At least 99.99% of all the distros ship with sudo installed, and yes, a
> few make it easy, when creating a user account, to add it to the
> administrative group (the wheel group). That, in my opinion, is how it
> should be done. That is ho
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 01:11 -0700, Gary Driggs wrote:
> On May 24, 2011, at 12:36 AM, "LinuxBSDos.com" wrote:
>
> > List as many as you can and I'll still be able to prove that "most of the
> > distros using sudo are derived from Ubuntu" is a statement of fact.
>
> OpenBSD ships with sudo and a r
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 17:28 +1000, Scott O'Brien wrote:
> Ok, enough with the troll wars.. Who cares? It's be nice to not get spammed
> with a million off-stopic e-mails imo
>
I find the discussion relevant and appropriate for the list at hand. If
you don't please filter on topic and delete. T
+1
Unix-like OS cover a wide range from OI to Os X to Solaris to Linux to BSD
to Linux and tbh I rather we chose the most portable version skill wise so
we can easily tempt people to try OI and hopefully enjoy and see what's good
about our favorite little bit of OS space.
It's pretty obvious that
On 24 May 2011 18:21, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I too don't appreciate the flamewar on here of Solaris vs Linux, sudo vs
> pfexec.
> If you don't like sudo, you don't have to use it. It's as simple as that.
>
> But bringing the default in-line with other modern-day Unixes such as Ma
hmm, thats a weird one ... the old drive does usually stay there until
it's replaced ...
you could just try removing both the disks from the mirror, then try
re-adding the new one into the array.
PS. If you don't care about the files that are damaged in the array,
you can just "rm" them and then
On 23 May 2011, at 22:29, Jeppe Toustrup wrote:
> 2011/5/23 Ken Gunderson :
>> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 15:39 -0400, Alex Smith (K4RNT) wrote:
>>> Another related question - why have we stopped using pfexec and
>>> started using sudo? I preferred RBAC...
>>
>> Have we? I've been testing 148b and ju
sure, two bacula backup files, I guess there isn't much to do about them, but
how the hell can I fix the pool?
replacing-5 DEGRADED 0 0 0
c4t6d0/oldOFFLINE 0 0 0
c4t6d0ONLINE 0 0 0 (resilvering)
This
what do you get from a "zpool status -v"?
do you know which files are corrupted?
On 23 May 2011 19:27, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a rather large pool that has been a bit troublesome. We've lost some
> drives (WD Black), and though that should work out well, I now have a poo
At least 99.99% of all the distros ship with sudo installed, and yes, a
few make it easy, when creating a user account, to add it to the
administrative group (the wheel group). That, in my opinion, is how it
should be done. That is how we all used to do it.
This might seem to be off topic, but I
Hi All,
I too don't appreciate the flamewar on here of Solaris vs Linux, sudo vs pfexec.
If you don't like sudo, you don't have to use it. It's as simple as that.
But bringing the default in-line with other modern-day Unixes such as MacOS and
most of the major Linux distributions seems entirely
>
>From: "LinuxBSDos.com"
>
>How many of those distros that are not based on Ubuntu can you name?
>
>Remember that we are talking about using sudo instead of the root account
>system, not just having sudo installed as an application.
>
>List as many as you can and I'll still be able to p
On Tuesday, May 24, 2011 04:11 PM, Gary Driggs wrote:
On May 24, 2011, at 12:36 AM, "LinuxBSDos.com" wrote:
List as many as you can and I'll still be able to prove that "most of the
distros using sudo are derived from Ubuntu" is a statement of fact.
OpenBSD ships with sudo and a root account
On May 24, 2011, at 12:36 AM, "LinuxBSDos.com" wrote:
> List as many as you can and I'll still be able to prove that "most of the
> distros using sudo are derived from Ubuntu" is a statement of fact.
OpenBSD ships with sudo and a root account accessible by anyone in the wheel
group. Where does t
How many of those distros that are not based on Ubuntu can you name?
Remember that we are talking about using sudo instead of the root account
system, not just having sudo installed as an application.
List as many as you can and I'll still be able to prove that "most of the
distros using sudo ar
Ok, enough with the troll wars.. Who cares? It's be nice to not get spammed
with a million off-stopic e-mails imo
On 24/05/2011, at 5:26 PM, Allan E. Registos wrote:
>
>
- Original Message -
>> From: "LinuxBSDos.com"
>> To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
>> Sent: Tuesday,
> > > - Original Message -
>From: "LinuxBSDos.com"
>To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
>Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 3:06:49 PM
>Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Update info?
>
>
> As an application, sudo pre-dates Ubuntu, but it is true that Ubuntu
>started this madness of r
As an application, sudo pre-dates Ubuntu, but it is true that Ubuntu
started this madness of replacing the root account system with sudo. It is
also true that most of the distros using sudo are derived from Ubuntu.
As far as I know, Redhat has never used sudo, but sudo has been available
as an ap
63 matches
Mail list logo
