well, do a bit math. if ima correct, with 320B DTT the 1.75GB of ram can fit
5.8M entries, 1TB of data, assuming 128k recordsize would produce 8M
entries thats with default metadata limit. unless i did my calculations
wrong, that will explain the slowdown.
On 22.04.2011, at 21:19, Roy
That's theory, in practice, even with sufficient RAM/L2ARC and some amount of
SLOG, dedup slows down writes to a minimum. My test was done with 8TB net
storage, 8GB RAM, and two 80GB x25-M SSDs devided into 2x4GB SLOG (mirrored)
and the rest for L2ARC. Application tested was Bacula with the OI b
On 04/22/11 07:43 AM, Gary Driggs wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2011, at 5:22 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> Even in solaris 11 express, which has a significantly newer version, dedup
>> isn't considered production worthy. So I would advise you to live without
>> it for now.
>
> Then what do you suppose i
On 04/22/11 08:09 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> At least one other project at opensolaris.org continues to receive
> updates. This is the IPS project which I closely track. There may be
> others too - I've not checked.
The Caiman installers do as well, as do the projects to build & package
mostly-
On 04/22/11 08:03 AM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
> Can someone "in the know" comment further on this?
Sorry, but no, we can't comment on that.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> At least one other project at opensolaris.org continues to receive
> updates. This is the IPS project which I closely track. There may be
> others too - I've not checked.
>
I just remembered that I also track the caiman-installer project
It appears that I mis-understood the memo.
Thanks for setting me straight.
Jerry
On 04/22/11 10:09, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> There was a "leaked" Oracle memo which stated that Oracle would stop
> commits, and would make source code available only when the final
> binary release of Solaris 11
The information about releasing the source was part of a leaked memo.
Oracle has made no official comitment to such a thing and the author
of the memo is no longer at Oracle.
No Oracle employee can reveal that information even if they had it
without risking both his job and a lawsuit.
On Fri, Apr
Jerry Kemp writes:
> That was my understanding also. I thought that only the binary/distro
> roll outs were stopping.
>
> Can someone "in the know" comment further on this?
>
> On 04/22/11 08:23, Ben Taylor wrote:
> > I thought Oracle was going to continue to release source snapshots after
> > a b
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Jerry Kemp wrote:
> That was my understanding also. I thought that only the binary/distro
> roll outs were stopping.
>
> Can someone "in the know" comment further on this?
>
This has been discussed a lot last year and this year.
There was a "leaked" Oracle memo
That was my understanding also. I thought that only the binary/distro
roll outs were stopping.
Can someone "in the know" comment further on this?
Jerry
On 04/22/11 08:23, Ben Taylor wrote:
>
> I thought Oracle was going to continue to release source snapshots after
> a binary release had bee
On Apr 22, 2011, at 5:22 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Even in solaris 11 express, which has a significantly newer version, dedup
> isn't considered production worthy. So I would advise you to live without
> it for now.
Then what do you suppose is Oracle using for dedup in their ZFS based unifie
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, ken mays wrote:
> Hi Ryo,
>
> http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/
>
What does that have to do with OpenIndiana?
-Albert
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mai
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
wrote:
>> From: James Kohout [mailto:jkoh...@yahoo.com]
>>
>> So looking to upgrade to io148 to be able to enable deduplication. So
>> does have any experience running a ZFS RaidZ2 pool with deduplication in
>> a production environment? Is ZFS
Hi Ryo,
http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/
~ Ken
--- On Fri, 4/22/11, 村川 了 wrote:
> From: 村川 了
> Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Where is iwl driver?
> To: "Discussion list for OpenIndiana"
> Date: Friday, April 22, 2011, 8:49 AM
> Hi, Ken
>
> Today I found the URL had been changed for
Hi, Ken
Today I found the URL had been changed for Intel 6250.
So if possible, I want to use iwl driver that is written in URL.
Could you send me it?
Regards.
Ryo
On 2011/04/21, at 4:47, ken mays wrote:
> Hi Ryo,
>
> There is no official Intel 6250 Wifi support yet for OpenIndiana.
>
> The I
> From: James Kohout [mailto:jkoh...@yahoo.com]
>
> So looking to upgrade to io148 to be able to enable deduplication. So
> does have any experience running a ZFS RaidZ2 pool with deduplication in
> a production environment? Is ZFS deduplication in oi148 considered
> stable/production ready? I
On 21 Apr 2011, at 23:07, Toomas Soome wrote:
>
> the basic math behind the scenes is following (and not entirely determined):
>
> 1. DTT data is kept in metadata part of ARC;
> 2. metadata default max is arc_c_max / 4.
>
> note that you can rise that limit.
>
> 3. arc max is RAM - 1GB.
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
