2011/2/3 Basil Kurian :
> [root@beastie /etc]# zpool create nas da0 da1
> [root@beastie /etc]# zpool list
> NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
> nas 23.9G 73.5K 23.9G 0% ONLINE -
> [root@beastie /etc]# zpool add nas da2
> [root@beastie /etc]# zpool list
> NAME SIZE USED
HI
*
I have some doubts on ZFS.*
[root@beastie /etc]# zpool create nas da0 da1
[root@beastie /etc]# zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
nas 23.9G 73.5K 23.9G 0% ONLINE -
[root@beastie /etc]# zpool add nas da2
[root@beastie /etc]# zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AV
On 02/02/11 17:20, Kirill Ponazdyr wrote:
Hi everyone,
Oh, yes serial console output is a good idea, I will do this tomorrow and
post the data.
The problem is really painful, I am able to boot into the life image now
but I cannot replace the driver with the different one, tried almost
everythin
Hi everyone,
Oh, yes serial console output is a good idea, I will do this tomorrow and
post the data.
The problem is really painful, I am able to boot into the life image now
but I cannot replace the driver with the different one, tried almost
everything, from adding a custom driver via manager G
*The Illumos pkgsrc project*
I have created Illumos pkgsrc project at
http://www.illumos.org/projects/worsoe.
The is about making NetBSD's pkgsrc http://www.pkgsrc.org shine on
Illumos/Openindiana. Pkgsrc already work on Illumos/Openindiana, but really
need some love to make it shine. Below are s
> My question is, how do I fix my raidz/zdisk?
In theory that raidz should be available even without the third drive. What
does cfgadm has to say about its status?
> Is there a way to fix the broken files i rpool, ..i don't have any
> backup.
> Is there a way to check if my disk are bad, it an v
On 02/02/11 10:00, ken mays wrote:
All motherboard manufacturers are providing free motherboard replacements
to their customers due to the issue.
Intel fixed the issue so early adopters getting a bad batched motherboard
just need to send them in for replacement (per approval process).
~ Ken May
> Nope, in that case installer should not see hard drives provided by
> cpqary driver instead of kernel panic.
>
> > - you can confirm by booting with -vk appended to the kernel line
> > which will keep the panic message visible.
>
> Kirill, are you able to take a picture of the panic stack?
>
.
All motherboard manufacturers are providing free motherboard replacements
to their customers due to the issue.
Intel fixed the issue so early adopters getting a bad batched motherboard
just need to send them in for replacement (per approval process).
~ Ken Mays
--- On Wed, 2/2/11, Edward Martine
Thanks, it looks like it's not caused by OOP plugins in Firefox 4.0. I
started the relevant thread in desktop-discuss:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=136965&tstart=0
Regards,
Hillel.
On 02/02/2011 09:21 AM, Jonathan Adams wrote:
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-containe
On 02/02/11 01:03, Okky Hendriansyah wrote:
Oh my. This is bad.:( I hope mine is not one of the 5%.:(
Thanks for the update though.
Hi,
Keep in mind the issue only relies on the motherboard chipset not
the CPU.
This issue may be really serious because all the motherboards using
those
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Plugin-container_and_out-of-process_plugins
dom.ipc.plugins.enabled ... try setting it to false and see if that helps.
Jon
On 2 February 2011 13:03, Gary Gendel wrote:
> Jon,
>
> Hillel and I are stuck between a rock and a hard place. They broke the
> firefox sync plu
Jon,
Hillel and I are stuck between a rock and a hard place. They broke the
firefox sync plugin in 3.6 (only for solaris) but the native one works
in 4.x. For me, it's currently moot because I can't get 148 running on
my laptop or server (for different reasons). Once the illuminos based
ve
Yeah I had problems, in the end I downgraded to FF 3.6 and the problem
went away.
You can turn off the plugin protection code (about:config ... can't
remember which specific flag to change) and it might well fix the
issue, but I don't need FF 4 yet.
On 1 February 2011 20:29, Hillel Lubman wrote:
On Jan 31, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Albert Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Kirill Ponazdyr wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to install OI build 148 on our DL585 G1 systems.
>>
>> They all have SmartArray 5i controller and, unfortunately, that controller
>> causes kernel panic with the in
Hi Edward,
Oh my. This is bad. :( I hope mine is not one of the 5%. :(
Thanks for the update though.
Best regards,
Okky Hendriansyah
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> On 01/30/11 23:30, Okky Hendriansyah wrote:
>
>> I just recently build a new rig for mostly virtualizatio
16 matches
Mail list logo
