On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:52:20 +0200, Alasdair Lumsden
wrote:
We will absolutely include things like Postfix. It drives me completely
nuts that things like that are missing.
I do not want people having to install Blastwave/OpenSFW or build things
themselves just to get basic common softwar
On 26/10/10 01:43 PM, BM wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 07:47 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
On 25 Oct 2010, at 06:20, Sunay Tripathi wrote:
I missed looking at this before hand. Let me check this out before we
go further. But I
So I ran truss on the master smbd process...
It appears that something fired a SIGTERM arrow at it and then tried to
cancel it with a SIGCONT arrow or something?
Received signal #18, SIGCLD, in pollsys() [caught]
siginfo: SIGCLD CLD_KILLED pid=22085 status=0x0006
pollsys(0x08047840,
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Christopher Chan
wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 07:47 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
>>
>> On 25 Oct 2010, at 06:20, Sunay Tripathi wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I missed looking at this before hand. Let me check this out before we
>>> go further. But I would point out th
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 07:47 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
On 25 Oct 2010, at 06:20, Sunay Tripathi wrote:
I missed looking at this before hand. Let me check this out before we
go further. But I would point out that SMF service is fine. Its the
tarball/rsync process to get the bits that w
Hi all,
I have a samba installation that is part of a AD domain and uses opends
for its ldap backend both for winbind and samba.
I keep getting problems with smbd. No problems with winbindd however. On
a separate note, why is nmbd not started? Anyway, back to smbd.
The logs have entries suc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2010 7:47 PM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
>
> What would also be very useful, is if you could pick a version to pull
down (eg 0.147), and this would download all the dependencies too. Our
0.147 build still has dependencies on Sun provided 0.13
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 08:36 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi Christopher,
On 26 Oct 2010, at 01:20, Christopher Chan wrote:
With regards to postfix and dovecot, I enable dove sasl support for postfix
(besides other stuff like milters,cdb, etc), vpopmail support for dovecot and I
also in
alasdai...@gmail.com said:
> We're going the spec files route, as this makes the most sense given the
> options available. As previously mentioned, Guido is working on "OpenIndiana
> Addon Consolidations" to provide additional software for the OS, you can see
> the draft spec here:
>
> http://wiki
Hi Christopher,
On 26 Oct 2010, at 01:20, Christopher Chan wrote:
> With regards to postfix and dovecot, I enable dove sasl support for postfix
> (besides other stuff like milters,cdb, etc), vpopmail support for dovecot and
> I also include sieve support for dovecot. How do you feel about havin
Hi Frank,
On 26 Oct 2010, at 00:08, Frank Middleton wrote:
> On 10/19/10 19:07, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Once the 134+ ONNV (kernel+core userland) is built, we'll make it
>> available as an upgrade to OpenSolaris snv_134. Hopefully this week,
>> if not then next week.
>
> It's u
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 07:52 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
On 25 Oct 2010, at 06:46, Joachim Pihl wrote:
Morning, all!
I installed OpenIndiana a few weeks ago on my home file server, as a
replacement for an old version of Solaris Community Edition after a bad case of
on-disk corruption.
On 25 Oct 2010, at 13:30, Gary Gendel wrote:
> Blastwave seems to be maintained adequately. The only problem I find with
> Blastwave is that it requires the world to be brought in, duplicating
> libraries already available as native packages to /opt/csw/. If that doesn't
> bother you then bl
On 25 Oct 2010, at 06:46, Joachim Pihl wrote:
> Morning, all!
>
> I installed OpenIndiana a few weeks ago on my home file server, as a
> replacement for an old version of Solaris Community Edition after a bad case
> of on-disk corruption. I figure it is time to set up an MTA and all the
> asso
On 25 Oct 2010, at 06:20, Sunay Tripathi wrote:
> I missed looking at this before hand. Let me check this out before we
> go further. But I would point out that SMF service is fine. Its the
> tarball/rsync process to get the bits that worrying. It would be good
> to make the creation of the loca
On 25 Oct 2010, at 05:20, Sunay Tripathi wrote:
>> I also don't think that the only "commercial viability" of OpenIndiana
>> will come from being to upgrade existing Solaris 10 installs. Surely
>> we want it to be commercially viable for free-standing new deployments
>> as well -- a goal which is
On 10/19/10 19:07, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
Hi All,
Once the 134+ ONNV (kernel+core userland) is built, we'll make it
available as an upgrade to OpenSolaris snv_134. Hopefully this week,
if not then next week.
It's understood that SPARC is lower priority and IIRC there's been very
little discus
On 24 Oct 2010, at 19:23, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> taemun wrote:
>> Lastly, I'd love to see some kind of alias system worked out for pkg,
>> whereby typing "pkg install libvorbis" can work out by itself that libvorbis
>> is part of the ogg_vorbis pkg, and just go get that. Having to type pkg
>>
Hi Taemun,
On 24 Oct 2010, at 04:27, taemun wrote:
> Someone on Debian-testing has added rows for claws-mail and pgadmin3, and
> I'm going to have to remove them.
>
> The layout of that sheet is intentionally following that of distrowatch
> (Column A is of the form "abiword (2.8.6)", which Colum
On 24 Oct 2010, at 01:39, Jeppe Toustrup wrote:
> I have started with making a copy of the DistroWatch sheet, and tried
> to only list server related packages on that list - since it's what I
> know most about. It mainly shows lack in mail servers (exim, postfix),
> ftp servers (proftpd, vsftpd),
On 25 Oct 2010, at 16:56, ken mays wrote:
> The inquired packages are within Blastwave's stronghold and still
> 'professionally' maintained and supported for the global Solaris/OpenSolaris
> community:
>
> 1. PostgreSQL 8.4.3
> 2. GCC 4.5.1 / GDB 7.2
> 3. Postfix 2.7.1
> 4. Dovecot 1.0.13
> 5.
The inquired packages are within Blastwave's stronghold and still
'professionally' maintained and supported for the global Solaris/OpenSolaris
community:
1. PostgreSQL 8.4.3
2. GCC 4.5.1 / GDB 7.2
3. Postfix 2.7.1
4. Dovecot 1.0.13
5. AMP
6. Python 2.6.4/2.7
If you want the latest versions of
* Joachim Pihl [2010-10-25 07:46]:
> There are a few different Postfix and Dovecot packages floating
> around the net. The problem is telling which package is going to be
> maintained. Is the Blastwave repository actively maintained, and
> actually usable? Will the OpenIndiana project eventually i
On 10/25/10 8:00 AM, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
Send OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list submissions to
openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
o
24 matches
Mail list logo