Hello,
yes in any case the specification and branch seems a serious step forward,
thank you for the hard work!
Will try to test more deeply in the coming weeks.
Regards.
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:09 AM, "Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe
informatique Numérigraphe" wrote:
> Excellent!
> I'm
Excellent!
I'm looking forward to work with this when you merge it into the trunk.
Lionel.
Le 03/07/2013 00:05, Fabien Pinckaers a écrit :
Did you check the new branch (same name but with -fp) It has 3000 lines of code
removed and costing is more isolated allowing an easy inheritancy
Sent from
Did you check the new branch (same name but with -fp) It has 3000 lines of code
removed and costing is more isolated allowing an easy inheritancy
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Jul 2013, at 09:28, "Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique
Numérigraphe" wrote:
> Fabien,
> I've had a quick lo
Fabien,
I've had a quick look at the dev branch : impressive stuff !
I have just one additional request right now: would you please split the
costing code to separate modules?
We're going to deeply audit/review the average costing code but doing
this right now is insanely hard.
Thanks in advanc
Great news!
Congratulations everyone, this is big. I know I'm demanding at times but
now, /that/ is cool.
Unfortunately we can't make it to the open days because we're in
inventory right now and we want our IT team on the field (logistics rule
our world these days)
So, It would be really cool i
Hi,
I understand and it's OK. I think I know how hard this is to achieve.
Thanks for the dev branch, that'll be quite enough. We'll try to follow it.
Lionel Sausin.
Le 27/06/2013 09:54, Joël Grand-Guillaume a écrit :
Hi Lionel,
I perfectly understand your point... The thing is honestly, I a
Thanks Fabien for your efforts on that and for making a real collaboration
possible ! Hope it'll go more and more this way in the future :) !
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a detailed presentation planned for the community days of next
> week.
>
>
Hello,
We have a detailed presentation planned for the community days of next week.
If some wants to challenge the proposed model, quentin will be available during
the community days to discuss
I guess the slides will be available after.
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Jun 2013, at 08:54, Joël
Gra
Hi Lionel,
I perfectly understand your point... The thing is honestly, I already make
double efforts (and work too much those last months) here to push forward
the OpenERP standard features instead of "just" making them for my
customer. I'm convinced that this is the good way to go, and I always
Thanks Joël,
We're quite willing to adapt what we've done so far to the new system.
We now have a full time developer for our logistics projects.
So, we would appreciate as much detail as possible while the
implementation is going on. A blog would be really great.
Otherwise we'll have to wait un
Thank you very much for your feed-back ! It is very appreciated.
For the picking interface, something has been plan that intend to address
your video + packaging stuff
For the historical cost by company, it is absolutely mandatory. Quants
should do the trick, but we still need to verify the use c
As a reminder, I'd also like to point to this extensive blueprint we
wrote last year about the picking GUI.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+spec/new-partial-picking-wizard
Demo implementation here:
http://fr.slideshare.net/openobject/openerp-new-procedure-for-partial-deli
Title: Eric CAUDAL
Hi Lionel,
thanks for the feedback and support.
Storing every price changes in a separate table with data and time
should allow you to query anytime about the cost.
Anyway I am not sure about the best way to technically do it but
On 06/24/2013 03:35 PM, "Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe
informatique Numérigraphe" wrote:
Dear Eric and others,
Thank you all for this big and needed push forward.
We're in the process of restructuring our logistics using OpenERP, and
mostly we agree with Eric's view.
My remarks so far a
Dear Eric and others,
Thank you all for this big and needed push forward.
We're in the process of restructuring our logistics using OpenERP, and
mostly we agree with Eric's view.
My remarks so far are inlined bellow.
I am well aware that some of what we expose here is not supposed to be
in the
Title: Eric CAUDAL
Hi,
We have worked lately quite a lot on the warehouse management in
an implementation for Internet company delivering processed and
non-processed food with several delivery and preparation batch per
day (To be noted that in 3 months operations,
Ok,
I'll try to centralize all remarks and make a confcall with Quentin with
everything I receive to discuss it.
Thanks,
Joël
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Write a document with remarks based on this one and send it to Quentin (
> q...@openerp.com) a
Hi Eric,
Write a document with remarks based on this one and send it to Quentin
(q...@openerp.com) and Joel. (and cc to me too) The fastest we get your
feedback the best it is as we already started the implementation.
Sent from my iPad
On 21 Jun 2013, at 04:40, Eric Caudal wrote:
> Hi Joel,
Title: Eric CAUDAL
Hi Joel,
There is this great document based on your think tank between c2c
and OpenERP:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jTLZJNV14saRn1VeZt_wME18YizEnEHB9ZX97WSqavs/edit
Is there a way to feedback our experiences and existing
contributi
19 matches
Mail list logo
