Re: [Openerp-community] Tagged versions 7.0 and 6.1 run red on runbot

2014-03-18 Thread Lionel Sausin
Hi Lionel, I have no problem adding those tags and forwarding them to trunk, but it may take me quite a while if I have to locate the revisions to tag. I would definitely appreciate if someone can help with that :-) Cheers, OK sure. For the moment I'm not sure how to find them because I nee

Re: [Openerp-community] Tagged versions 7.0 and 6.1 run red on runbot

2014-03-18 Thread Olivier Dony
On 03/14/2014 10:42 AM, Lionel Sausin wrote: Do you think you could do the following, at least for the supported releases? - find the earliest revision of the release-branch (ie. openobject-addons/7.0) which runs green on runbot (I can help with this if you want) - tag it with something like "7.0

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~therp-nl/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing-fix_dataloss into lp:~openerp-community/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing

2014-03-18 Thread Sandy Carter (http://www.savoirfairelinux.com)
Review: Approve code review, no test OK, sorry about the misunderstanding. Nevertheless, I would prefer to see some assertions, gets and tries as this function looks likely to throw an IndexError. But I see you've take them into account (removal of redundant checks, values checking, etc) -- htt

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~therp-nl/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing-fix_dataloss into lp:~openerp-community/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing

2014-03-18 Thread Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
@Sandy, This code relies on the constructed view which guarantees that when selection_fieldname occurs in vals, then so does 'fieldname'. In the case of m2m, it's value is guaranteed to be in the form [(6, 0, list)], so accessing the list through vals[model_field][0][2] should be fine. -- https

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~therp-nl/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing-fix_dataloss into lp:~openerp-community/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing

2014-03-18 Thread Sandy Carter (http://www.savoirfairelinux.com)
Review: Needs Fixing code review @Stefan: I thin you missed the point of vals[model_field]: There is a chance of a KeyError if model_field not in val and a chance of index error if len(vals[model_field]) < 1 or len(vals[model_field][0]) < 3 -- https://code.launchpad.net/~therp-nl/server-env-tool

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~openerp-community/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing into lp:server-env-tools/6.1

2014-03-18 Thread Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
l.550: when the user makes a selection of m2m values to remove, the code executes a [(5, 0, [])]. This removes all values. My branch executes a [(3, value) for each value]. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing/+merge/161619 Your team OpenERP Communi

Re: [Openerp-community] [Merge] lp:~therp-nl/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing-fix_dataloss into lp:~openerp-community/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing

2014-03-18 Thread Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
Thanks for the comments. Now using vals[model_field][0][2] or [], taking Francesco's response on the mailing list into account. Changing some variable names after complaints by pylint. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~therp-nl/server-env-tools/6.1-mass_editing-fix_dataloss/+merge/201321 Your tea