Title: Eric CAUDAL
You need to alter the search function
linked to the object so that it takes into account the fields you
want.
Eric CAUDAL, Elic
On 2012-11-22 18:33, jeff.wang wrote:
> Have you checked "Advanced Search" ?
Yes, the advanced search allows for searching the description
field, indeed. This is, however, not very convenient. And I
could not find any way to search the comments as well.
It would be nice to have a single search fi
Title: Eric CAUDAL
+1
The community branch should be absolutely bugproof and well
designed. Let's try to favor quality over quantity
Eric CAUDAL,
Dear all,
Niels and Eric are now in the team. Thank you all for your trust and enthusiast
about this new organization !
Let's have this dialog continue on the new mailing list as Stefan suggested
(openerp-community-revie...@lists.launchpad.net).
@Daniel & Pieter: Everyone is still free to de
Forgot to 'reply all', in this case to the community and community
leaders list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Openerp-expert-framework] [Openerp-community]
[Openerp-community-leaders] New Community Organization for OpenERP
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:18:16 +0100
From: St
(+1) My vote for Serpent CS team, camp2camp team, Stefan and Niels.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Peter Langenberg <
peter.langenb...@bubbles-it.be> wrote:
> My vote for Serpent CS team, camp2camp team, Stefan and Niels.
>
--
Juan Cristobal Lopez Arrieta
http://www.openerp.com/node/560
My vote for Serpent CS team, camp2camp team, Stefan and Niels.
Peter
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : http
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Niels Huylebroeck wrote:
> Thanks all for the confidence for mentioning me, I've been in a very busy
> week and was unable to jump into the conversation until now.
>
> I understand there was some concern about quality control and who gets to
> decide "wh
Dear all (particulary Alexandre &
Pieter)
Both positions are respectable but do not have the same goal.
Then, let us keep the "OpenERP community" as it is (according to
Pieter) and let us make a new "organized OpenERP alternative task
force" (a
Hi Alexandre,
Of course you are free to disagree. Allow me to make a few remarks though:
The sole reason someone *can* share code, is because it was written,
used by and payed for by someone who apparently cared and was happy with
it. Your whole idea of "unwilling" and/or "uncaring" authors is
As far as I can see, these community projects are not registered in Runbot.
It it possible to have them registered there, so it's branches are
automatically tested?
Also, I can't see code coverage statistics, which is also a useful indicator.
Can this be provided by Runbot?
Regards
Daniel Reis
Maxime Chambreuil (http://www.savoirfairelinux.com) has proposed merging
lp:~openerp-community/sale-wkfl/6.1-mail_quotation into lp:sale-wkfl.
Commit message:
[MRG] Allow sending quotation by email.
Requested reviews:
Sale Core Editors (sale-core-editors)
For more details, see:
https://code.l
The proposal to merge lp:~openerp-community/sale-wkfl/6.1-mail_quotation into
lp:sale-wkfl has been updated.
Commit Message changed to:
[MRG] Allow sending quotation by email.
For more details, see:
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/sale-wkfl/6.1-mail_quotation/+merge/135731
--
htt
[MRG] Allow sending quotation by email.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/sale-wkfl/6.1-mail_quotation/+merge/135731
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:~openerp-community/sale-wkfl/6.1-mail_quotation.
___
Mailing list
Hello to all, I am not sure if you are
planing to control every module that is developed and the
developer wants to upload it to the community branch.
IMHO this is going to be a hard work for the reviewers, and maybe
a bunch of modules are going to leave "pending"
Thanks all for the confidence for mentioning me, I've been in a very busy
week and was unable to jump into the conversation until now.
I understand there was some concern about quality control and who gets to
decide "when" or "if" something is acceptable.
While this may sound harsh and "exclusive"
+1 Niels (agaplan)
On Thursday 22 November 2012 08:39 PM, Maxime Chambreuil wrote:
+1 for Eric
--
Maxime Chambreuil
1-514-276-5468 #126
Dear all,
A little summarizing of all candidates and their status ;)
- Vauxoo Revi
+1 for Eric
--
Maxime Chambreuil
1-514-276-5468 #126
- Mail original -
Dear all,
A little summarizing of all candidates and their status ;)
- Vauxoo Reviewer team is now 5 people. We all agreed to trust Nhomar here so I
added them to the reviewer team.
- Jay Vora claimed i
Dear all,
A little summarizing of all candidates and their status ;)
- Vauxoo Reviewer team is now 5 people. We all agreed to trust Nhomar here so
I added them to the reviewer team.
- Jay Vora claimed in favor of adding his team "serpent CS" instead of his
name. I also know Hussein and I can
I agree with Pieter. A contributor can't do worst than his first
contribution, which is his module, and can we block the access to the owner
of the module? He still has the intellectual property and by this has the
right to make his module evolve...
One different thing is to make a first review on
You still miss my point. It is not in the behavior of the reviewers I
foresee impoliteness, but in the fact that someone contributing a new
module and making enhancements to his own module, is forced to convince
a tribune of reviewers of the quality of this new contribution.
The flow can becom
On 11/22/2012 12:51 PM, Serpent Consulting Services wrote:
Dear Community,
Pleasure to be in this team for sure.
Jay Vora is an individual entity, Husen Daudi is an individual entity
but SerpentCS is a team. (Just the same way all of you together make a
tremendous team)
I have stopped using
Dear Community,
Pleasure to be in this team for sure.
Jay Vora is an individual entity, Husen Daudi is an individual entity
but SerpentCS is a team. (Just the same way all of you together make a
tremendous team)
I have stopped using the Jay Vora account and planned to resume once its
karma
On jeu. 22 nov. 2012 11:54:49 CET, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> You have taken my response out of its context. I was not speaking of
> merges into other peoples code bases. They should be assessed.
> Nonetheless a brute "no" is considered impolite there too. Even more
> when it is t
On 11/22/2012 11:45 AM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote:
Dear Community,
I forget to also suggest to include :
- Jay Vora (Serpent Consulting Services)
As part of the OpenERP Community Reviewer team. He worked for OpenERP
SA for a long time and know it very well. He has the open source
spirit as
+1 for red15 (niels from Agaplan)
Le 22 nov. 2012 à 11:54, Peter Langenberg a écrit :
> Joël,
>
> I Agree 100 % Jay is a high level guy.
>
> Maybe a can sugest also 'red15' (niels) from Agaplan, also a high level
> developer.
>
> Peter
>
> On 11/22/2012 11:45 AM, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote:
(and the public response)
Hi Alexandre,
You have taken my response out of its context. I was not speaking of
merges into other peoples code bases. They should be assessed.
Nonetheless a brute "no" is considered impolite there too. Even more
when it is the original author whose code you refuse
On 22/11/2012 10:31, Pieter J. Kersten wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> I agree with Joël. I see your points, but this is not a matter of
> "best possible code", but of "decent manners".
>
> There is a saying: "You cannot look a given horse into the mouth".
> Meaning: when you are given a unique contri
Dear Community,
I forget to also suggest to include :
- Jay Vora (Serpent Consulting Services)
As part of the OpenERP Community Reviewer team. He worked for OpenERP SA for a
long time and know it very well. He has the open source spirit as well !
Would you endorse him as well ?
Regards,
Jo
Dear Community,
The following person are now invited to be part of the "OpenERP Community
Reviewer" team:
- Camptocamp Community Reviewer (Alexandre Fayolle, Guewen Baconnier, Nicolas
Bessi, and me)
- Nhomar Hernandez (Vauxoo)
- Raphaël Valyi (Akretion)
- Stefan Rijnhart (Therp)
- Olivier Dony
Hi Martin,
Have you checked "Advanced Search" ?
Jeff
-- Original --
From: "W. Martin Borgert";
Date: Thu, Nov 22, 2012 06:00 AM
To: "openerp-community";
Subject: [Openerp-community] How to search in project issues
(version6.2dev-20121119)
Hi,
I wonde
Le 22/11/2012 10:31, Pieter J. Kersten a écrit :
I agree with Joël. I see your points, but this is not a matter of
"best possible code", but of "decent manners".
Hmm... manners are such a cultural thing, sometimes it's hard not to
offend others...
In a culturally neutral way, I too suggest that
Review: Needs Fixing
ligne 77: je mettrais des guillemets autour des de colonnes (sinon on a
l'impression d'une faute d'accord)
ligne 426: s/Vous avez saisit/Vous avez saisi/
ligne 466: s/être définit/être définie/
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-member
Review: Needs Fixing remove product_gs1_128
Hi,
This module is actually not related to products at all. It only provides and
API for other modules to be able do decompose the data of gs1 barcodes.
So I suggest not to include it here.
Thanks,
Lionel.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-communi
<<< text/html; charset=UTF-8: Unrecognized >>>
<>___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net
Op 22-11-12 09:58 schreef Alexandre Fayolle:
On mer. 21 nov. 2012 09:38:10 CET, Alexis de Lattre wrote:
Le 16/11/2012 16:41, Joël Grand-Guillaume a écrit :
For all of these projects, the rules we expect you to adhere to and
respect are:
*
Nobody merge his/her own work into the branch.
Review: Needs Information
Hello,
The module product_gs1_128 has been proposed for inclusion in the stock and
logistic barcode project
(https://code.launchpad.net/~numerigraphe/stock-logistic-barcode/6.1-gs1-128-barcodes/+merge/134657)
We really don't want the same module to live in 2 different
Review: Needs Fixing
s/en -tête/en-tête/
Il reste une espace avant la virgule ligne 381.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-mail-trans-fr/+merge/135455
Your team OpenERP Community is subscribed to branch
lp:~openerp-community/openobject-addons/trunk-mail-t
On mer. 21 nov. 2012 09:38:10 CET, Alexis de Lattre wrote:
> Le 16/11/2012 16:41, Joël Grand-Guillaume a écrit :
>> For all of these projects, the rules we expect you to adhere to and
>> respect are:
>>
>> *
>>
>> Nobody merge his/her own work into the branch. Another member of
>> the team
On 2012-11-21 17:48, Nhomar Hernández wrote:
> http://doc.openerp.com/v6.1/developer/index.html#book-develop-link
¡Gracias! Indeed, it was just adding the fields to the file
project_issue.py (_columns member of class project_issue)
and the right part of the view in project_issue_view.xml.
Not as
40 matches
Mail list logo
