Re: [OE-core] [poky] RFC: design of network based PR service

2011-04-28 Thread Lu, Lianhao
hu, Apr 28, 2011 at 03:08:03PM +0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote: >>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>> >>>>> Here is the design of network based PR service, please help to >>>>> review and give you comment. Thanks a lot! >>>> >>>> Hi, >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] network based PR service(revised)

2011-05-26 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Koen Kooi wrote on 2011-05-26: > > Op 26 mei 2011, om 13:55 heeft Lianhao Lu het volgende geschreven: > >> This is a modification of the original patch to enable network based PR >> service. >> >> The main difference between this series of patch to the original one is >> that this one uses the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] conf/bitbake.conf: Added variables for PR service.

2011-05-26 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Phil Blundell wrote on 2011-05-26: > On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 19:55 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: >> -EXTENDPV = "${EXTENDPEVER}${PV}-${PR}" >> +EXTENDPV = "${EXTENDPEVER}${PV}-${PKGR}" > > That looks a bit weird. Is it really correct to be mixing PV and PKGR like > that? > > FWIW, oe master has: > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/5] conf/bitbake.conf: Added variables for PR service.

2011-05-26 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Phil Blundell wrote on 2011-05-26: > On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 20:43 +0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote: >> The problem is that in OE-core the default -deb/-dbg packages are >> all using EXTENDPV, as well as some other recipes. Do you mean we >> should make them all using EXTENDPKGV instead

[OE-core] [Multilib] a problem of SHLIBSDIR

2011-06-29 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Hi, SHLIBSDIR is a central place where to store the pkg information about the shared libraries which the package would provide. In the do_package task, the function package_do_shlibs() will use this kind of information to automatically add RDEPENDS for the package being built. In the multilib

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] gcc: Drop part of the 64bithack patch which is no longer used

2011-07-28 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-07-27: > Since we now handle GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in gcc-configure-common.inc: > > 's#\(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER[^ ]*\)\( *"/lib.*\)#\1 SYSTEMLIBS_DIR\2#' > It seems to me that this patch may not be removed. The above code in gcc-configure-common.inc said it only useful

Re: [OE-core] [RFC BUG #1236 2/2] eglibc: Modify ldd script according to multilib config.

2011-07-29 Thread Lu, Lianhao
> -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of > Phil Blundell > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 11:38 PM > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFC

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] package(rootfs)_ipk.bbclass: support multilib in opkg backend.

2011-07-31 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Khem Raj wrote on 2011-07-31: > On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:50:26 PM Richard Purdie wrote: >> From: Lianhao Lu >> >> Support install multiple multilib in opkg backend. >> >> The installation is done in 3 phases. >> >> Phase 1: install normal packages to IMAGE_ROOTFS. >> >> Phase 2: install mu

Re: [OE-core] [RFC BUG #1236 2/2] eglibc: Modify ldd script according to multilib config.

2011-07-31 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Khem Raj wrote on 2011-07-31: > On Friday, July 29, 2011 10:57:27 PM Lianhao Lu wrote: >> Part fix of [BUGID #1236]. >> >> 1. Collect all the values for RTLDLIST for the current multilib >> configuration to modify the ldd scripts. >> >> 2. Collect all the values for KNOWN_INTERPRETER_NAMES for th

Re: [OE-core] base.bbclass: Ensure PREFERRED_PROVIDER and PREFERRED_VERSION values are set for multilibs

2011-08-08 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-08-05: > When running multilib builds its not intuitive for the specificed > versions/providers to be build in one case and the higher version in the > other. > This patch mirrors the options unless they're already set. > > There shouldn't be any effect if the MULTILI

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] x86 tune inc files: add x32 abi tune parameters

2011-08-09 Thread Lu, Lianhao
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote on 2011-08-06: > From: Nitin A Kamble > > Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble > --- > meta/conf/machine/include/ia32/arch-ia32.inc | 19 +-- > meta/conf/machine/include/tune-core2.inc |4 > meta/conf/machine/include/tune-x86_64.inc|

Re: [OE-core] populate_sdk: We need to ensure that the SDK sysroot reflects PACKAGE_ARCH

2011-08-09 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-08-10: > If we don't do this, the SDK target sysroot is named generically even > when it contains package architecture specific optimisations. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- > diff --git a/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass > b/meta/classes/populate_sdk.bbclass

[OE-core] [RFC Bug #892] Putting siteconfig cache files into ROOTFS

2011-08-10 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Hi guys, When trying to fix bug #892(http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=892), I met some problems in generating the default site config files used by cross-canadian toolchain. When using autoconf for cross-compile, it is impossible to check features that require running a test progr

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] image: populate site config files into roootfs.

2011-08-11 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Phil Blundell wrote on 2011-08-11: > On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 22:31 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: >> [YOCTO #892] populate the site config files content into the file in >> {target}/cross_site_config in rootfs, which can be used by the cross >> toolchain in meta-toolchain when the rootfs is used as sysroot

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] image: populate site config files into roootfs.

2011-08-11 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Saul Wold wrote on 2011-08-12: > On 08/11/2011 06:09 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote: >> Phil Blundell wrote on 2011-08-11: >>> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 22:31 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: >>>> [YOCTO #892] populate the site config files content into the file >>>> in {targ

Re: [OE-core] [RFC] Performance Issue: Build time increases

2011-08-12 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Robert Yang wrote on 2011-08-12: > > Hi folks, > > The build time of core-image-sato increases about 5 ~ 10 minutes than > the following commit: > > commit 5af197b55a4b779f1ec93186f0723026949ba2b5 > Author: Liping Ke > Date: Fri Jun 3 08:22:40 2011 +0800 > > cache: Implement multiple ex

Re: [OE-core] Blocker - [Bug 1070] [deb] core-image-sato-sdk.bb: do_rootfs failed: unmet dependencies

2011-08-19 Thread Lu, Lianhao
wenzong fan wrote on 2011-08-19: > Hi Folks, > > I think I was blocked by this defect now, and it also blocked the #1086: > > http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1070 > > I have try to add the depended packages to 'package_to_install', but > they won't be installed at all. I know a li

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] gcc-common.inc: Added shared source support for basichash.

2012-01-16 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Richard Purdie wrote on 2012-01-17: > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 19:43 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: >> [YOCTO #1555] >> Adding new mechanism to allow multiple gcc related recipes sharing the >> same src directory when using the basichash as the signature handler. >> >> Using the same stamp file for multip

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] gcc-common.inc: Added shared source support for basichash.

2012-01-19 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Richard Purdie wrote on 2012-01-19: > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 03:05 +0000, Lu, Lianhao wrote: >> Richard Purdie wrote on 2012-01-17: >>> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 19:43 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: >>> >>> Can you please check if this can be fixed by: >>> &

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc: Ensure that the shared source directory shared the same sstate hashes

2012-01-20 Thread Lu, Lianhao
> -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf > Of Saul Wold > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 4:19 PM > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH]

[OE-core] do_patch signature confliction for gcc family recipes

2012-02-08 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Hi guys, I just found that the gcc-runtime-nativesdk has different task signature for task do_patch, comparing to that of gcc-cross-initial. This would cause a do_patch failure if we use OEBasicHash as the BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER. By comparing their sigdata files, it turns out that the difference

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 12/20] zlib: Upgrade 1.2.5 -> 1.2.6

2012-02-13 Thread Lu, Lianhao
It works if you -c cleansstate on a bunch of recipes, pango, cairo, fontconfig, gtk+, etc >>> I tried rpm-native after "-c cleansstate", but it still asks for libz.la? Anyone has the clue? Best Regards, Lianhao ___ Openembedded-cor

[OE-core] packaging errors in some -nativesdk recipes

2012-03-20 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Hi guys, When I'm looking at some package warnings of eglibc-nativesdk(and some other -nativesdk packages' warnings), e.g. WARNING: For recipe eglibc-nativesdk, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package: WARNING: /opt/poky/1.1+snapshot/sysroots/x86_64-poky

Re: [OE-core] can't install eclipse plugin

2011-12-30 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Qinliang, You might need to update the lttng to 0.4.0 in Eclipse through http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/update first. Best Regards, Lianhao > -Original Message- > From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openem

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/20] Kernel Updates and other fixes

2012-07-01 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Hi Richard, > Lianhao Lu (3): > classes/image: Allow openssh empty passwords login. > image/core-image: Handle conflicting IMAGE_FEATURES. > task-core-tools-debug: Added openssh-sftp-server. I saw only the first patch "openssh empty password" was merged. What's the status of the other 2 pa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 2/3] image/core-image: Handle conflicting IMAGE_FEATURES.

2012-07-02 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Richard Purdie wrote on 2012-07-02: > On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 13:15 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: >> IMAGE_FEATURES such as 'ssh-server-dropbear' and 'ssh-server-openssh' >> can't be both enabled. User can use the following variables to define >> the relationship of image features: >> >> IMAGE_FEATURES_

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 04/20] image/core-image: Handle conflicting IMAGE_FEATURES.

2012-07-02 Thread Lu, Lianhao
The problem is that the REPLACES/CONFLICTS method which defined in debian polocy is not supported by the ipk backend. -lianhao "Dennis.Yxun" 编写: is that possible to have a virtual/ssh-server mechanism, provide either openssh or dropbear would server this dependency, quite similiar with what

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/5] eglibc-nativesdk: Set GCC_ADDONS.

2012-04-02 Thread Lu, Lianhao
I've recreated the patches per Richard's comment. However, removing nptl from the add-on settings resulted an eglibc configure error saying that it is an required add-on. -Lianhao Khem Raj wrote on 2012-03-31: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> nptl is bogus now a days. so

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] connman: Fixed multilib support.

2012-04-05 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Saul Wold wrote on 2012-04-06: > On 04/05/2012 04:49 AM, Lianhao Lu wrote: >> 1. Added static depends to ofono. >> 2. Corrected the package content of connman-test. >> >> This is part of the bug fixing [YOCTO #2216]. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lianhao Lu >> --- >> meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/co

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] meta-toolchain: runqemu falied on FC16/Opensuse12.1 x86_64

2012-04-09 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Robert Yang wrote on 2012-04-09: > Test info: > * Have tested on: > * Fedora 16 x86_64 > * Opensuse 12.1 x86_64 Robert, Hongna just found a qemu launch error on openSuse x86_64 using the 2.15 eglibc-nativesdk, something about the SDL initialization error. Did your platform work well? >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] connman: ensure ofono package is generated.

2012-04-09 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Saul Wold wrote on 2012-04-10: > On 04/05/2012 11:20 PM, Lianhao Lu wrote: >> Make sure ofono package is generated when buidling connman, because >> dynamic package connman-plugin-ofono has a RDEPENDS on ofono. >> > Since this is for a plugin, can the connman-plugin-ofono be generated in > a sepa

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] meta-toolchain: runqemu falied on FC16/Opensuse12.1 x86_64

2012-04-09 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Robert Yang wrote on 2012-04-10: > > > On 04/09/2012 08:21 PM, Robert Yang wrote: >> >> >> On 04/09/2012 06:36 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote: >>> >>> Robert Yang wrote on 2012-04-09: >>>> Test info: >>>> * Have tested on

[OE-core] is the virtual package -tanslation correct?

2012-04-24 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Hi guys, I found that in package.bbclass when generating the -locale packages, it sets RPROVIDES to provide the virtual packages -translation, d.setVar('RPROVIDES_' + pkg, '%s-locale %s-translation' % (pn, ln)) This would result different real packages provide the same -translation, i.e. egli

[OE-core] baselib_dir for udev in multilib cases

2012-04-27 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Koen Kooi wrote on 2012-04-27: > > Op 27 apr. 2012, om 12:47 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > >> On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 13:04 +0800, Lianhao Lu wrote: >>> Use the base_libdir to set the udev rules directory. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Lianhao Lu >>> --- >>> meta/recipes-multimedia/al

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 0/7] Misc fixings for multilib

2012-05-01 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Saul Wold wrote on 2012-05-02: > On 04/26/2012 11:34 PM, Lianhao Lu wrote: >> 1. Added a package QA check function in multilib case. It checkes whether >> there is a package runtime dependency on packages with names not prefixed >> by $MLPREFIX. >> >> 2. Fixed a bunch of recipes to use $libdir an

[OE-core] FW: [yocto] Broken SDK

2012-05-29 Thread Lu, Lianhao
Does anyone have the answers to the following question? Thanks! Regards, -Lianhao From: Navani Srivastava [mailto:navani.srivast...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 5:03 PM To: Lu, Lianhao Cc: yo...@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] Broken SDK Hi Lianhao, These patches worked for