On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:47:08AM -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble
>
> parallel build fix patches are not needed as they are upstream now.
> Got a new set of debian patch set for 5.14.2
I know that nobody wants PR bumps and nobody cares so much about upgrade
paths o
Op 25 okt. 2011 om 09:06 heeft Martin Jansa het
volgende geschreven:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:47:08AM -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
>> From: Nitin A Kamble
>>
>> parallel build fix patches are not needed as they are upstream now.
>> Got a new set of debian patch set for 5.14.2
>
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 09:06 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:47:08AM -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Nitin A Kamble
> >
> > parallel build fix patches are not needed as they are upstream now.
> > Got a new set of debian patch set for 5.14.2
>
> I know that
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 01:33:46PM +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:16 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:40:20AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Martin Jansa
> > > wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
> > > > ---
>
* this isn't probably complete list.. just what failed here
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
---
meta/recipes-core/expat/expat_2.0.1.bb |2 +-
meta/recipes-devtools/git/git_1.7.7.bb |2 ++
.../perl/libxml-parser-perl_2.41.bb|2 +-
.../perl/libxml-si
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:17:11AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
>
> Op 25 okt. 2011 om 09:06 heeft Martin Jansa het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:47:08AM -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> >> From: Nitin A Kamble
> >>
> >> parallel build fix patches are not neede
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 09:31 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * this isn't probably complete list.. just what failed here
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/expat/expat_2.0.1.bb |2 +-
> meta/recipes-devtools/git/git_1.7.7.bb |2 ++
> .../perl/li
Hi,
I just tried out OE core according to the instructions at
http://www.angstrom-distribution.org/building-angstrom and
http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/meta-texasinstruments/tree/README
At home this works fine, but being inside my company's firewall during
the day I have
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman
---
.../sudo/{sudo_1.8.1p2.bb => sudo_1.8.3.bb}|6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/sudo/{sudo_1.8.1p2.bb => sudo_1.8.3.bb} (82%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/sudo/sudo_1.8.1p2.bb
b/meta/recipes-e
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman
---
.../grep/{grep_2.8.bb => grep_2.9.bb} |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-extended/grep/{grep_2.8.bb => grep_2.9.bb} (88%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/grep/grep_2.8.bb
b/meta/recipes-extended/grep
Hello,
Here is a set of some straightfoward recipe upgrades: sudo, grep,
mtools, and openssh.
Build testing: These have been successfully built for all 5 qemu
architectures.
Runtime testing: I have performed basic runtime testing for all of
these recipe upgrades as well within a qemux86 session.
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman
---
.../mtools/{mtools_4.0.16.bb => mtools_4.0.17.bb} |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/mtools/{mtools_4.0.16.bb => mtools_4.0.17.bb}
(80%)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/mtools/mtools_4.0.16.bb
b/meta/r
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman
---
.../openssh/{openssh-5.8p2 => openssh-5.9p1}/init |0
.../{openssh-5.8p2 => openssh-5.9p1}/nostrip.patch |0
.../{openssh-5.8p2 => openssh-5.9p1}/ssh_config|0
.../openssh/{openssh-5.8p2 => openssh-5.9p1}/sshd |0
.../{openssh-5.8p2 => openssh
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman
---
.../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc | 32 ++--
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc
index 1f3540e
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 09:26 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> That's why I've called it work around in cover, because I think that fixing
> it in
> old 0.9.23 is not worth it, we can try to fix it in 1.1 when we have it.
Fair enough, though as a general rule I don't think the cover letter is
the right
Hello,
I've been using this script to perform audits of which packages
are producing documentation, and feel it's long overdue for this
to be added to the git tree. So here it is.
The following changes since commit f586aaa8d00361a9597a546d665077c75cf4d520:
libxml-parser-perl, libxml-simple-per
This script is used to enumerate which recipes are building
documentation. It does this by checking that a -doc package
gets generated and contains files.
The script works by building each recipe using the output from
bitbake -s.
It will generate several report files, listing which recipes
includ
Hi,
Recent changes to dbus have broken some sdk building:
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['meta-toolchain-qte',
'task-qte-toolchain-host-nativesdk', 'qt4-tools-nativesdk', 'dbus-nativesdk',
'base-passwd-nativesdk']
I think the commit introducing the base-passed dependency is
46e
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Julian Pidancet
wrote:
> +do_configure_prepend () {
> + export fu_cv_sys_stat_statfs2_bsize=yes
I'm asking out of curiosity.. why don't these go in meta/site/common instead?
-M
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Julian Pidancet
wrote:
> This patch introduces a distro feature which enables gcc to produce
> both 32bit and 64bit code, and enables binutils to operate on both
> 32bit and 64bit binaries. It differs from multilib toolchains in
> that it does not require to compil
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> James Limbouris
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 October 2011 9:35 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: [OE-core] useradd cha
21 matches
Mail list logo
