If user set MULTILIB_PACKAGE_INSTALL, we need to install those multitlib
packages into the final image.
Also fix the logic in handling multilib prefix. For certain case like a
normal image contains several multilib libraries, the image recipe isn't
extended with MLPREFIX, therefore we need to enum
For supporting multilib, architecture information is needed in package
require/provide/suggest/recommend fields.
Use DEFAULTTUNE value as the postfix.
For "all" arch recipe, it requires "all" arch recipe with no postfix,
but provides all possible multilib archs.
For example, qemu-config:
Requir
Currently MACHINE_ARCH deploy folder is unique in multilib system, thus
a lib32 version of rpm package will override a normal rpm package if
its PACKAGE_ARCH is ${MACHINE_ARCH}.
Define different deploy folder for multilib architectures to avoid the
confliction.
Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu
---
me
Hi Richard and Mark,
This pull request is to fix several multilib related issues to rpm, includes:
1) Add architecture information in RPM spec file to fix bug 1457.
2) For recipes with MACHINE_ARCH as PACKAGE_ARCH, the deploy folder is defined
as tmp/deploy/lib32(64)-${MACHINE_ARCH} to avoid con
On Saturday 10 September 2011 21:07:45 Eric Bénard wrote:
> - this patch comes from Nokia and blacklist all DigiNotar intermediates
> and root certificates, more details are available here :
> http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2011/09/07/what-the-diginotar-security-breach-mean
> s-for-qt-users-continued/
>
On Sunday 11 September 2011 18:33:35 Eric Bénard wrote:
> - 4.7.4 was release on the 1st of september, the changelog is available
> here :
> http://qt.gitorious.org/+qt-developers/qt/releases/blobs/v4.7.4/dist/chang
> es-4.7.4 and mostly contains bug fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard
> ---
> .
Once the Linux Foundation servers come back on-line, I'll file a bug in the
bugzilla.yoctoproject.org bug tracker.
Hopefully this is something fairly simple, and fixing the target prelink-rtld
will also resolve the failed prelinking for the QT binary.
I hope to get to investigating this tomorrow.
This patch is incorrect. Architectural information should not be in the
dependencies within RPM packages.
RPM is expected to find the proper version of a package to install based on the
existing dependency information. I'm in the process of investigating why
certain items are not found properly.
On 9/12/11 3:34 AM, Dongxiao Xu wrote:
> Currently MACHINE_ARCH deploy folder is unique in multilib system, thus
> a lib32 version of rpm package will override a normal rpm package if
> its PACKAGE_ARCH is ${MACHINE_ARCH}.
>
> Define different deploy folder for multilib architectures to avoid the
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Mark Hatle
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:56 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [
On 9/12/11 10:07 AM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
>> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
>> Mark Hatle
>> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:56 PM
>> To: openembedded-cor
FYI
Original Message
Subject: [oe] Server Maintainence 0200-0600 UTC 13SEPT2011
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:57:25 -0700
From: Tom King
Reply-To: openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org
To: openembedded-de...@lists.openembedded.org
We will be doing server maintainence this even
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Mark Hatle
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:52 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [
Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Mark Hatle
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 1:23 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Mark Hatle
> Sent: Monday, 12 September 2011 10:50 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] Problem with
15 matches
Mail list logo