Op 8 jul. 2011 om 07:53 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks
het volgende geschreven:
>
>
> 2011/7/8 Saul Wold
> [YOCTO #1214]
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc |2 +-
> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc.inc |2 +-
> meta/recipes-core/egli
iirc only the ids package depends on bash, and only to check for wget. Fixing
the update script would be better
Op 8 jul. 2011 om 00:31 heeft Saul Wold het volgende
geschreven:
> [YOCTO #1214]
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
> ---
> meta/recipes-bsp/usbutils/usbutils_0.91.bb |5 +++--
> 1 fi
2011/7/8 Koen Kooi
>
>
> Op 8 jul. 2011 om 07:53 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks <
> fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>> -#RDEPENDS_ldd +=" bash"
>> +RDEPENDS_ldd +=" bash"
>>
>
> Ah ok, now see that this is only for ldd.
> In that case the commit message is misleading. (and pro
Op 8 jul. 2011 om 02:40 heeft "Cui, Dexuan" het volgende
geschreven:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 07/07/2011 01:39 AM, Dexuan Cui wrote:
>>> busybox-1.18.4 installs /bin/powertop and the powertop recipe
>>> installs /usr/bin/powertop. So, in PATH, if /bin appears before
>>> /usr/bin, we would run t
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:12 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 14:39 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > How about changing the recipe to fetch from binutils-2_21-branch and
> > call it binutils 2.21 as it is
>
> I don't really see the benefits in fetching this from the SCM?
Agreed, seem
On Friday 08 July 2011 06:21:16 Khem Raj wrote:
> If oe-core never supported older kernel than 2.6.37 then setting it to
> 2.6.37 would be better IMO
It's not necessarily just about oe-core - it's about what layers get used on
top, and some of those will be using kernels older than 2.6.37.
Cheer
On Friday 08 July 2011 01:53:38 Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Andrea Adami > >>
> >> +image = bb.data.getVar('INITRAMFS_IMAGE', d, True)
> >> +if image != '' and image is not None:
> ^^^
> Is this ok ?
Probably "if image:" would be better.
C
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 09:38 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 08 July 2011 06:21:16 Khem Raj wrote:
> > If oe-core never supported older kernel than 2.6.37 then setting it to
> > 2.6.37 would be better IMO
>
> It's not necessarily just about oe-core - it's about what layers get used on
> to
On Friday 08 July 2011 09:46:34 Chris Elston wrote:
> It's very rare that we get a free hand in the choice of kernel version.
> We get stuck with whichever version the silicon vendor chooses to
> support, so it would be bad for us if we couldn't use an older kernel in
> our layers.
Just out of int
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 09:38 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 08 July 2011 06:21:16 Khem Raj wrote:
> > If oe-core never supported older kernel than 2.6.37 then setting it to
> > 2.6.37 would be better IMO
>
> It's not necessarily just about oe-core - it's about what layers get used on
> to
On Friday 08 July 2011 10:53:49 Phil Blundell wrote:
> They can always provide their own OLDEST_KERNEL setting, though. To
> some extent I think it's a bit academic what the default in oe-core is.
Yes, but let's have a sensible default value, in particular that will allow
the majority not to exp
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 08 July 2011 10:53:49 Phil Blundell wrote:
> > They can always provide their own OLDEST_KERNEL setting, though. To
> > some extent I think it's a bit academic what the default in oe-core is.
>
> Yes, but let's have a sensible def
On Friday 08 July 2011 11:12:12 Phil Blundell wrote:
> If OLDEST_KERNEL is set to a value that's too new then the failure you
> get is anything but subtle: glibc will just print "kernel too old" and
> exit.
OK, I had just assumed you would just get errors about missing syscalls, good
to know that
On 6 jul 2011, at 20:32, "Darren Hart" wrote:
>
> On 07/06/2011 10:31 AM, Anders Darander wrote:
>> Hi Darren,
>>
>> On 6 jul 2011, at 18:37, "Darren Hart"
>> wrote:
>>> The scripts are recreated during the build of module.bbclass
>>> derived recipes. Are you trying to build modules independe
From: Chris Larson
- Name the screen session 'devshell', to avoid confusion if running bitbake
itself under a screen session.
- Display a warning message when spawning screen, so it's clear to the user
that screen has been run (otherwise do_devshell just appears to hang).
Signed-off-by: Chri
The following changes since commit f05b7ee7716d1e5cc1ba0bbab57e91c3a0569e9e:
x-load: Update to 1.5.0 (2011-07-05 14:16:33 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core master
https://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core/tree/master
Chris Larson (2):
Rework how
Some classes, as for example nativesdk, defines CPPFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
to be passed to compiler. Using those makes more sense and avoid some
hacks on packages using CMake.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/classes/cmake.bbclass |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(
From: Chris Larson
In the new implementation, each known terminal is defined as a class in
oe.terminal, as a subclass of bb.process.Popen. terminal.bbclass wraps this
functionality, providing the metadata pieces. It obeys the OE_TERMINAL
variable, which is a 'choice' typed variable. This varia
* use INC_PR;
* show configure's failure on error;
* gather major version from PV;
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.3.bb |4 ++--
meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc |6 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-
TARGET_ARCH makes the building too fragile since it changes during
building of target and nativesdk binaries thus making it difficult to
handle a proper path for installation of binaries. The fix for it is
to move it to toolchain tarball name.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/classes/popu
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.3.bb |7 ---
meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.5.bb | 12
.../cmake/cmake/support-oe-qt4-tools-names.patch | 14 +++---
.../cmake/{cmake_2.8.3.bb => cmake_2.8.5.bb}
Adds a recipe that provides the nativesdk and target versions of
CMake.
This recipe is based on code from OpenEmbeeded (rev
b1f2e1501c19540617a829b37415c0616101c7ad).
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
.../cmake/cmake/dont-run-cross-binaries.patch | 22 ++
meta/recipes-devtools/c
This recipe has been imported from OpenEmbedded (rev
6db4b9050e0e8b963e2a6b63790e48e3042ea99e).
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
.../0001-Patch-from-upstream-revision-1990.patch | 42 +
.../0002-Patch-from-upstream-revision-1991.patch | 31 ++
.../0003-Patch-from-up
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> [YOCTO #1196]
>
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
We seem to be seeing quite a lot of patches recently whose long-form
comment consists of a Yocto bug number, S-O-B line and nothing else.
That might be fine for the most notorious bugs, where even no
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Friday 08 July 2011 06:21:16 Khem Raj wrote:
>> If oe-core never supported older kernel than 2.6.37 then setting it to
>> 2.6.37 would be better IMO
>
> It's not necessarily just about oe-core - it's about what layers get used on
> top, and
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 22:42 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 04:38 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> >> [YOCTO #1171]
> >>
> >> Add /var space for zypper due to its space usage for db maintence
> >
> > This hasn't been tested for opkg/deb and
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 16:37 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote:
> +do_install_locale () {
> + dest=${D}/${includedir}/glibc-locale-internal-${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}
> + install -d ${dest} ${dest}${bindir}
> + cp -fpPR ${D}${base_libdir} ${dest}${base_prefix}
> + cp -fpPR ${D}${libdir} ${dest}$
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:25 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 8 jul. 2011 om 02:40 heeft "Cui, Dexuan" het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> > Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On 07/07/2011 01:39 AM, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> >>> busybox-1.18.4 installs /bin/powertop and the powertop recipe
> >>> installs /usr/bin/powerto
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:25 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble
>
> The following changes since commit 2c79c9eb7ef8ef0aef8c3096c3c4387e28e56ea2:
>
> pulseaudio: add 0.9.23 (2011-07-07 13:45:32 +0100)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://git.pokylinux
On 07/06/2011 04:39 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 07/06/2011 07:06 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Tuesday 05 July 2011 19:37:24 you wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 17:31 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Is it possible some people are still using PCMCIA/CF cards with this
hardware in it?
>>>
>>>
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:25 -0700, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble
>
> To fix these package qa warnings
> WARNING: For recipe binutils, the following files were installed but not
> shipped in any package:
> WARNING: /usr/bin/ld.bfd
> WARNING: /usr/bin/elfedit
>
> Sign
Hi Phil,
After reading through the various other bluez-dtl1 patches, I have no
concerns with this patch. In the future, please include a blurb in the
patch header that provides some context. The only patches that should
have nothing but a subject line are things like "bump the pr" and
"whitespace
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> This recipe has been imported from OpenEmbedded (rev
> 6db4b9050e0e8b963e2a6b63790e48e3042ea99e).
The piece of data I don't have here is the reason we need this OE-Core?
Cheers,
Richard
___
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> * use INC_PR;
> * show configure's failure on error;
> * gather major version from PV;
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
Merged to master, thanks.
Richard
___
Openembedded-core mailing l
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Adds a recipe that provides the nativesdk and target versions of
> CMake.
>
> This recipe is based on code from OpenEmbeeded (rev
> b1f2e1501c19540617a829b37415c0616101c7ad).
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
[...]
> +# FIXME: H
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.3.bb |7 ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.5.bb | 12
> .../cmake/cmake/support-oe-qt4-tools-names.patch |
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Some classes, as for example nativesdk, defines CPPFLAGS and CXXFLAGS
> to be passed to compiler. Using those makes more sense and avoid some
> hacks on packages using CMake.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> meta/classes/cmake
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:26 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > @@ -35,11 +35,13 @@ FILES_${PN}-symlinks = " \
> > ${bindir}/c++filt \
> > ${bindir}/gprof \
> > ${bindir}/ld \
> > + ${bindir}/ld.bfd \
> > ${bindir}/nm \
> > ${bindir}/objcopy \
> > ${bindir}/objdump \
> >
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> TARGET_ARCH makes the building too fragile since it changes during
> building of target and nativesdk binaries thus making it difficult to
> handle a proper path for installation of binaries. The fix for it is
> to move it to toolchain tar
I'm not sure whether there are pending patches which will address these
or not, but with a fresh pull from today I'm still not getting very good
packaging for eglibc 2.13. Specifically:
WARNING: For recipe eglibc, the following files were installed but not
shipped in any package:
WARNING: /etc/
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:35, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.3.bb | 7 ---
>> meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.5.bb | 12
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:28 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> iirc only the ids package depends on bash, and only to check for wget. Fixing
> the update script would be better
Agreed and I'll take a follow up patch on this one.
The fix in itself is correct as the script is wanting bash currently.
Cheer
On 07/07/2011 04:11 PM, Andrea Adami wrote:
> * from org.openembedded.dev (oe-classic)
Hi Andrea,
Please include a descriptive blurb about the patch. When people read
through the commit log they need to know what problem this patch
addresses and how it intends to go about it. If possible, it sh
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:11 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote:
> Hi Saul,
>
> This pull request fixes the alsa-tools recipe build error.
> Please help to review and pull.
>
> [YOCTO #1038]
>
> Thanks,
> Dongxiao
>
> The following changes since commit 2c79c9eb7ef8ef0aef8c3096c3c4387e28e56ea2:
>
> puls
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:27, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> This recipe has been imported from OpenEmbedded (rev
>> 6db4b9050e0e8b963e2a6b63790e48e3042ea99e).
>
> The piece of data I don't have here is the reason we need this OE-Core?
cmake u
Op 8 jul. 2011 om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie
het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:25 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 8 jul. 2011 om 02:40 heeft "Cui, Dexuan" het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Tom Rini wrote:
On 07/07/2011 01:39 AM, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> busybox-1.18
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:31 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> Richard,
>
> This address the bash, xcb missing from libx11, locale issue and
> the lack of space due to zypper eating space.
>
> Sau!
>
>
> The following changes since commit f1fc6d084b079dea21ff1a30b815496452042490:
>
> pulseaudio: add
Op 8 jul. 2011 om 16:38 heeft Darren Hart het volgende
geschreven:
>
>
> On 07/07/2011 04:11 PM, Andrea Adami wrote:
>> * from org.openembedded.dev (oe-classic)
>
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Please include a descriptive blurb about the patch. When people read
> through the commit log they need to kno
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:28, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Adds a recipe that provides the nativesdk and target versions of
>> CMake.
>>
>> This recipe is based on code from OpenEmbeeded (rev
>> b1f2e1501c19540617a829b37415c0616101c7ad).
>>
>
On Friday 08 July 2011 16:49:12 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> +# FIXME: Hack due gcc-crosssdk not being able to detect those
> >> automatically +CXXFLAGS_virtclass-nativesdk += " \
> >> + -I${STAGING_DIR_HOST}${SDKPATHNATIVE}/usr/include/c++ \
> >> + -I${STAGING_DIR_HOST}${SDKPATHNATIVE}/usr/incl
On 07/01/2011 12:16 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 1 jul 2011, om 08:54 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
>
>> [YOCTO #1198]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
>> ---
>> ...Drop-config.h-include-in-tools-imximage.h.patch |0
>> ...ove-LDSCRIPT-processing-to-the-top-level-.patch |0
>> ..
I'll take a look when I get back into the country next week
Op 8 jul. 2011 om 16:38 heeft Richard Purdie
het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> TARGET_ARCH makes the building too fragile since it changes during
>> building of target and nativesdk
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:12 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 14:39 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:25 PM, wrote:
> >>> From: Nitin A Kamble
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
> >>> ---
> >
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> From: Chris Larson
>
> In the new implementation, each known terminal is defined as a class in
> oe.terminal, as a subclass of bb.process.Popen. terminal.bbclass wraps this
> functionality, providing the metadata pieces. It obeys the O
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:50 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:27, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> This recipe has been imported from OpenEmbedded (rev
> >> 6db4b9050e0e8b963e2a6b63790e48e3042ea99e).
> >
> > The piec
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 17:08 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Friday 08 July 2011 16:49:12 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > >> +# FIXME: Hack due gcc-crosssdk not being able to detect those
> > >> automatically +CXXFLAGS_virtclass-nativesdk += " \
> > >> + -I${STAGING_DIR_HOST}${SDKPATHNATIVE}/usr/inclu
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:51 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Since v1, this now updates the value to 2.6.16 instead of 2.6.0.
>
> The following changes since commit f1fc6d084b079dea21ff1a30b815496452042490:
>
> pulseaudio: add 0.9.23 (2011-07-07 13:44:36 +0100)
>
> are available in the git reposi
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 07:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > On Friday 08 July 2011 06:21:16 Khem Raj wrote:
> >> If oe-core never supported older kernel than 2.6.37 then setting it to
> >> 2.6.37 would be better IMO
> >
> > It's not necessarily j
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:23 -0700, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> The following changes since commit c412674cf818e77e35857fb93353e392e7ac9e53:
> Khem Raj (1):
> package.bbclass,prserv.bbclass: Compare USE_PR_SERV with "1" or "0"
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.yoctop
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 18:32 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> I found a couple of issues with the recent insane.bbclass changes. The
> following patches fix them as well as add a warning fix for something I
> noticed when building a kernel with LIRC support.
>
> The following changes since commit f1fc
On Friday 08 July 2011 17:22:31 Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 17:08 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > Yes, and I don't like it there either. Suggestions on fixing this would
> > be welcome - in the time I spent trying to figure out why it wasn't
> > working (some months ago) I couldn'
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:57 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 8 jul. 2011 om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie
> het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:25 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>
> >> Op 8 jul. 2011 om 02:40 heeft "Cui, Dexuan" het
> >> volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >>> Tom Rini w
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 13:18, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:50 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 12:27, Richard Purdie
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:47 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> This recipe has been imported from OpenEmbedded (rev
>> >>
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> I'm not sure whether there are pending patches which will address these
> or not, but with a fresh pull from today I'm still not getting very good
> packaging for eglibc 2.13. Specifically:
>
> WARNING: For recipe eglibc, the following fil
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 17:28 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> This is the third version of Yu Ke's combo-layer tool. Changes since v2:
> * Fix splitpatch so that it handles commits that only affect some of the
>components (reports the ones that have been skipped and avoids writing
>out empty p
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 17:49 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> I'm guessing something is going wrong with prefixes somewhere. I'm
> certainly not seeing the bulk of those locally...
I just realised that the gconv/locale ones are my fault; I had patched
do_install_locale() locally to try to fix a diffe
I sent a patch to fix /etc/localtime & /etc/rpc files. Other than that I am not
seeing any issues for the eglibc recipe packaging.
Nitin
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Thanks for clarifications. I will rework the patch to take out the rpc.
Nitin
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Khem Raj
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 2:41 PM
> To: Pat
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Richard Purdie
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:27 AM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PAT
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 22:10 +0800, Yu Ke wrote:
> if libdir is not /usr/lib, e.g. libdir=/usr/lib64, eglibc will
> have build failure:
> "
> cross-localedef --uint32-align=4 --little-endian --force --old-style
> --no-archive
> --prefix=/home/kyu3/sdb/lib64/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-linux/eglibc-2.1
Richard,
You can make similar patch for localtime, (which is a broken link), Otherwise
I will send a patch for it.
Nitin
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Richard Purd
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:22 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> You can make similar patch for localtime, (which is a broken link),
> Otherwise I will send a patch for it.
Send the patch please.
Cheers,
Richard
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openemb
Richard,
This is v2 of my patch set with updated commit messages and
reworked changes. I grabbed the oe-dev change for ldd bashims,
but still included the RDEPENDS for others until the maintainers
update the scripts.
Thanks
Sau!
The following changes since commit 93ce74a299832ca7f24b4
[YOCTO #1171]
This is a temporary fix to address the fact that zypper's db configuation
uses a large amount of /var space. When the correct'ed zypper config can
be applied, this fix can be removed. The zypper bug for yocto is 1174
http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174
Signed-off-by:
(From oe-dev rev: 0a831e2cd1c27d30cd76ddada9a44a703ab60f41)
* replace shebang of ldd by /bin/sh, so ldd doesn't depend on bash
anymore. Tested with busybox sh.
* added to do_configure_prepend because do_patch is only a python function
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Si
[YOCTO #1214]
The eglibc-utils contains 2 scripts (tzselect and xtrace) that use
bash, so add an RDEPENDS to eglibc-utils.
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 09:59 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> I sent a patch to fix /etc/localtime & /etc/rpc files. Other than that I am
> not seeing any issues for the eglibc recipe packaging.
I pushed:
http://git.openembedded.net/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core/commit/?id=93ce74a299832ca7f24b4ce1b95
[YOCTO #1196]
XCB support is needed in libx1l, it has been enabled in libx11-trim for
sometime and was not in full version. The usage here is for LSB testing,
which uses full libx11.
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold
---
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11_1.3.4.bb | 11 ---
1 files changed,
On 07/08/2011 09:31 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:23 -0700, Jessica Zhang wrote:
>> The following changes since commit c412674cf818e77e35857fb93353e392e7ac9e53:
>> Khem Raj (1):
>> package.bbclass,prserv.bbclass: Compare USE_PR_SERV with "1" or "0"
>>
>> are availab
We only have arm-common, common, ix86-common, mips-common, powerpc-common,
sh-common under site, no Linux-common or glibc-common, and it's defined in all
the arches-common files except mips-common.
Thanks,
Jessica
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
Otherwise the following "mv ${libdir}/gconv" fails because the destination
has already been created.
Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell
---
meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.
I'm trying to get some basic oe-core builds going (core-image-sato)
and am running into:
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
/scratch/oe/openembedded-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/i586-oe-linux/libmatchbox-1.9-r8/temp/log.do_fetch.24235
Log data follows:
| NOTE: fetch
http://projects.o-hand.com/mat
The reason for the bogus dependencies is that these files are landing in
libc6-dev rather than the places where they ought to be:
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 42592 2011-07-08 20:16 ./lib/libnss_nis.so.2
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 30408 2011-07-08 20:16 ./lib/libthread_db.so.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 5
Op 8 jul. 2011 om 18:43 heeft Richard Purdie
het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:57 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 8 jul. 2011 om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:25 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 8 jul. 2011 om
Op 8 jul. 2011 om 19:19 heeft Richard Purdie
het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 09:59 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>> I sent a patch to fix /etc/localtime & /etc/rpc files. Other than that I am
>> not seeing any issues for the eglibc recipe packaging.
>
> I pushed:
>
> http:/
I have a crude merged version of siteinfo.bbclass in meta-oe, any volunteers to
have à look at the differences?
Op 8 jul. 2011 om 21:07 heeft "Zhang, Jessica" het
volgende geschreven:
> We only have arm-common, common, ix86-common, mips-common, powerpc-common,
> sh-common under site, no Linux
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> Phil Blundell
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:34 AM
> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATC
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 14:15 -0700, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> Just verified that ld.bfd is a soft link to i586-poky-linux-ld.bfd
>
> So what is the right think here, rm -f ld.bfd, or putting it in the symlinks
> package is good?
Do the same thing that you do with ${bindir}/ld, whatever that is.
Ho
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 07/07/2011 04:11 PM, Andrea Adami wrote:
>> * from org.openembedded.dev (oe-classic)
>
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Please include a descriptive blurb about the patch. When people read
> through the commit log they need to know what problem this patc
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:16 -0400, Cliff Brake wrote:
> I'm trying to get some basic oe-core builds going (core-image-sato)
> and am running into:
>
> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
> /scratch/oe/openembedded-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/i586-oe-linux/libmatchbox-1.9-r8/temp/log.do_fetch.24235
On 07/08/2011 01:49 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> I have a crude merged version of siteinfo.bbclass in meta-oe, any volunteers
> to have à look at the differences?
Ug, I didn't know oe-core was missing all of that. Shoot it over to me,
I'll take a look Monday.
>
> Op 8 jul. 2011 om 21:07 heeft "Zhang
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 20:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Otherwise the following "mv ${libdir}/gconv" fails because the destination
> has already been created.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-package.inc |6 --
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+),
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 10:29 -0700, Saul Wold wrote:
> Richard,
>
> This is v2 of my patch set with updated commit messages and
> reworked changes. I grabbed the oe-dev change for ldd bashims,
> but still included the RDEPENDS for others until the maintainers
> update the scripts.
>
> Thanks
>
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 15:28 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 02:52 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:16 -0400, Cliff Brake wrote:
> >> I'm trying to get some basic oe-core builds going (core-image-sato)
> >> and am running into:
> >>
> >> ERROR: Logfile of failure
The bb-matrix.sh script will run a bitbake command, building core-image-minimal
by default, for various combinations of BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE. It
records all relevant metrics of the TIME(1) command for each combination in a
data file.
The bb-matrix-plot.sh script can be used to visua
Add bb-matrix.sh and bb-matrix-plot.sh. Example output of these scripts is
viewable here:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Build_Performance#bb-matrix
The following changes since commit 9f4eaeef33da5595748253d59d95c7ca548e28fa:
libx11: enable xcb support (2011-07-08 23:02:08 +0100)
are avai
96 matches
Mail list logo
