From: Yu Ke
Test with qemux86, qemuarm, and atom-pc
Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
Branch: kyu3/upgrade-05-11
Browse:
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=kyu3/upgrade-05-11
Thanks,
Yu Ke
---
Yu Ke (5):
xf86-video-intel: upgrade from 2.14.0 to
From: Yu Ke
- also remove the libtool.patch since it is already in the release version
- update the LIC_FILES_CHKSUM, the license is not changed, just use
sqlite3.h as more appropriate license file. the original sqlite3.c
is actually not point to license content.
Signed-off-by: Yu Ke
---
m
From: Yu Ke
- update the license checksum due to SUN/Oracle name changing
- remove the nodolt.patch because it is already in upstream and release
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=a769f4c22a9cfb5ba248c924a66c31ec966bd8a0
- update the patch upstream status
Signed-off-by: Yu
From: Yu Ke
Signed-off-by: Yu Ke
---
.../distro/include/preferred-xorg-versions.inc |2 +-
...-intel_2.14.0.bb => xf86-video-intel_2.15.0.bb} |6 +++---
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/{xf86-video-intel_2.14.0.bb =>
xf86-vi
From: Yu Ke
- the following patches are no longer used, so remove them
doublefix.patch
drmfix.patch
fix_macros.patch
libdri-xinerama-symbol.patch
xorg-server-disable-dri_sarea.patch
xorg-server-enable-dri2.patch
xserver-1.5.0-bg-none-root.patch
xserver-DRI2Swapbuffer.patch
xserv
From: Yu Ke
- remove the following patches, since they are already in upstream
xserver-xf86-lite/libdri-xinerama-symbol.patch,
xserver-xf86-lite/drmfix.patch
xserver-xf86-lite/nodolt.patch
xserver-xf86-lite/revert_make_sys_c_use_unaligned_access_functions.patch
- rebase the patch for 1.10
This fix makes ctypes build for python-native which may be needed by extensions
that utilize ctypes and use setuptools/distutils as their build system.
Tested building pyudev for beagleboard target using Ângstrom distro.
Signed-off-by: Michael Lippautz
---
.../recipes-devtools/python/python-nat
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 21:35 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> This fixes the problem that I described in
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2011-May/001966.html
>
> Additionally we do not need directories with */packages/* in BBFILES
> anymore
>
> Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.or
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 23:30 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> From: Otavio Salvador
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
> ---
> meta/conf/bitbake.conf |8
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Merged to master, thanks.
Richard
___
Openemb
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > From: Richard Purdie
> >
> > These are the minimal defaults to allow OE-Core to function standalone with
> > no distro set and are constucted such that the distro ca
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:24 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:03:57PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Martin/Tom: Serious question - why not use the contrib repo for this?
>
> I have nothing against contrib repo and I'm using oe-core-contrib for
> oe-core stuff, but I had gi
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:31 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > From: Richard Purdie
> >
> > The intent is to allow distros to share common core config but still allow
> > customisations. The core should work with no distro set b
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:58 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > From: Richard Purdie
> >
> > As discussed, we want to make OE-Core usable with no distro set. This patch
> > series
> > makes some big steps towards that goal. I'd
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:17 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:24 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:03:57PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> Martin/Tom: Serious question - why not use the contrib repo for this?
>>
>> I have nothing agains
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:09 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> From: Richard Purdie
>>>
>>> These are the minimal defaults to allow OE-Core to function
Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:45 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:58 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> From: Richard Purdie
>>>
>>> As discussed, we want to make OE-Core usable with no distro
From: Leon Woestenberg
(Re-)add powerpc-linux-gnuspe support, as from OpenEmbedded.
Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
Branch: likewise/gnuspe
Browse:
http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=likewise/gnuspe
Thanks,
Leon Woesten
From: Leon Woestenberg
Re-add powerpc-linux-gnuspe, from OpenEmbedded. Also adds support
to poky.conf so that minimal-core-image builds with DISTRO=poky,
Signed-off-by: Leon Woestenberg
---
meta/classes/siteinfo.bbclass |1 +
meta/conf/distro/poky.conf|1 +
2 files changed, 2 inser
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:45 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> > For the uclibc bits, I'm proposing
> > to add:
> >
> > +DEPLOY_DIR_append = "-uclibc"
> > +STAGING_DIR_TARGET_append = "-uclibc"
> > +STAGING_DIR_HOST_append = "-uclibc"
On 05/10/2011 09:28 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: poky-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:poky-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Gary Thomas
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:57 AM
To: Khem Raj
Cc: Poky Project; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subje
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:08 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:09 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >>> From: Richard Purdie
> >>>
Op 11 mei 2011, om 13:24 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:08 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:09 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 10 mei 2011, om 16:00 heeft Ri
Op 11 mei 2011, om 12:54 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:13 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:45 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>>> For the uclibc bits, I'm proposing
>>> to add:
>>>
>>> +DEPLOY_DIR_append = "-uclibc"
>>> +ST
2011/5/10 Richard Purdie
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:26 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> > Some minor remarks on the default-distrovars.inc contents:
>
> To quote the email prefacing this patch series:
>
> """
> I did dump a load of "default" variables into default-distrovars.inc,
> I'm not call
Hello,
how does the master branch of openembedded-core-contrib relate to the
master branch of openembedded-core?
Is -core-contrib tracking -core 1-to-1?
The reason I ask is that user contribution go into feature branches
(name/feature) of -core-contrib, but should ideally be based against
core i
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 15:00 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> From: Richard Purdie
>
> As discussed, we want to make OE-Core usable with no distro set. This patch
> series
> makes some big steps towards that goal. I'd be interested in feedback on
> whether it
> does the right things and would be u
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 13:43 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 11 mei 2011, om 13:24 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:08 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >> Op 11 mei 2011, om 11:09 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:20
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 14:37 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> how does the master branch of openembedded-core-contrib relate to the
> master branch of openembedded-core?
>
> Is -core-contrib tracking -core 1-to-1?
I probably shouldn't have pushed that at all to be honest, its just
likely to get ou
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 12:29 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> From: Leon Woestenberg
>
> (Re-)add powerpc-linux-gnuspe support, as from OpenEmbedded.
>
> Pull URL: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib
> Branch: likewise/gnuspe
> Browse:
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 17:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 16:59, Saul Wold wrote:
> > In Richard's email he proposed one or the other be set, why do you need to
> > set both here? If both need to be set then you don't need the override.
>
> Because they're different no?
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 14:51 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Sync with OE at 3b7d83362027fde4f6850533ab83277d95dda961 however
> without changing the way of generating the toolchain file and making
> it branding agnostic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> meta/classes/cmake.bbclass | 1
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 14:51 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> This writes a qt.conf inside WORKDIR to properly configure projects
> based on CMake. This is required since qmake variables (returned
> by -query command) are fixed into the binary and can only be
> changed using a qt.conf file.
>
> Sign
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 14:51 +, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake-native_2.8.3.bb |2 +-
> meta/recipes-devtools/cmake/cmake.inc |3 +-
> .../cmake/cmake/support-oe-qt4-tools-names.patch | 90
> +
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 13:16 -0500, Adrian Alonso wrote:
> * v2 redo commit to include remove previous version
> * Readline new recipe version 6.2
> * Readline remove version 6.1
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Alonso
Merged to master, thanks.
Richard
___
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 19:43 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi
> ---
> meta/recipes-devtools/git/git.inc |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/git/git.inc
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/git/git.inc
> index 7f12859..9c7375
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:27 +0800, Yu Ke wrote:
> From: Yu Ke
>
> Test with qemux86, qemuarm, and atom-pc
>
> Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
> Branch: kyu3/upgrade-05-11
> Browse:
> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=kyu3/upgrade-05-11
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yes, that's the only change. Building the kernel from the same
> source repository with 4.5.2 (using patches from you and Khem Raj)
> works perfectly.
>
Hi Gary,
The yocto-linux kernel had to go through few changes to mute some compiler
warnings with gcc 4.6.0. Are you building your own kern
On 05/11/2011 09:35 AM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
Yes, that's the only change. Building the kernel from the same
source repository with 4.5.2 (using patches from you and Khem Raj)
works perfectly.
Hi Gary,
The yocto-linux kernel had to go through few changes to mute some compiler
warnings wit
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:40 +0200, Michael Lippautz wrote:
> This fix makes ctypes build for python-native which may be needed by
> extensions
> that utilize ctypes and use setuptools/distutils as their build system.
>
> Tested building pyudev for beagleboard target using Ângstrom distro.
>
> Si
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:57 +0800, Zhai Edwin wrote:
> From: Zhai Edwin
>
> Upgrade qemu git to fix bug 1013, and removed some unused files.
>
> Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
> Branch: gzhai/fix3
> Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=gzhai/fix3
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 19:23 -0700, Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble
>
> Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
> Branch: nitin/bugfixes
> Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=nitin/bugfixes
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin A Kamble
> ---
>
>
> Nitin
* there is section for glibc but eglibc was missing
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
---
meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc
b/meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 22:40 -0700, Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> From: Nitin A Kamble
>
>
> Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
> Branch: nitin/misc
> Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=nitin/misc
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin A Kamble
> ---
>
>
> Nitin A Ka
Between myself and others, there are several outstanding proposals to
modify the pull-request scripts. Patches have been sent, but nothing has
been merged due to a lack of consensus. I thought I would summarize what
I see to be the current weaknesses of the scripts and my proposal to
address them.
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 14:16 -0700, Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
> Branch: nitin/misc
> Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=nitin/misc
> Khem Raj (1):
> gcc-4.6.0: Apply linaro patches
>
> Nitin A Kamble (15):
> mdadm:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 17:55 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * there is section for glibc but eglibc was missing
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
> ---
> meta/conf/distro/include/tcmode-default.inc |6 ++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Merged to master, thanks.
Richard
Op 11 mei 2011, om 18:15 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
> Between myself and others, there are several outstanding proposals to
> modify the pull-request scripts. Patches have been sent, but nothing has
> been merged due to a lack of consensus. I thought I would summarize what
> I see
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 13:57 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> * we had similar patch for native.bbclass
> 41d77ac37f606e54293826ba1e94a4254bddbfa6
> I have no idea if the same could be used for nativesdk, because I'm
> not using generated SDKs at all, that's why it's RFC and if there are
> bette
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 13:52 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
> ---
> meta/recipes-extended/procps/procps_3.2.8.bb |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Merged to master, thanks.
Richard
___
Openembed
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 09:28 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: poky-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:poky-
>>> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Gary Thomas
>>> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:57 AM
>>> To: Khem
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:01 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 12:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15:55, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> Add a -l switch that takes an argument of either github or gitorious
> >> and will make the cover letter have a fill-in-the-blank of where the
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> Between myself and others, there are several outstanding proposals to
> modify the pull-request scripts. Patches have been sent, but nothing has
> been merged due to a lack of consensus. I thought I would summarize what
> I see to be the curren
Hello Richard,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 14:37 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
>> how does the master branch of openembedded-core-contrib relate to the
>> master branch of openembedded-core?
>>
>> Is -core-contrib tracking -core 1-to-1?
>
>> My
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> >
> > Thoughts/Comments?
> >
>
> I would suggest to alter the process a bit and get rid of the scripts
> completely. Patches are sent to mailing list for review once reviewed
> the final pat
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 19:22 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> Hello Richard,
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 14:37 +0200, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> >> how does the master branch of openembedded-core-contrib relate to the
> >> master branch of
On 05/11/2011 09:22 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 11 mei 2011, om 18:15 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Between myself and others, there are several outstanding proposals
>> to modify the pull-request scripts. Patches have been sent, but
>> nothing has been merged due to a lack of c
On 05/11/2011 10:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>
>>> Thoughts/Comments?
>>>
>>
>> I would suggest to alter the process a bit and get rid of the scripts
>> completely. Patches are sent to
On 05/11/2011 10:03 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:01 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On 05/10/2011 12:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15:55, Tom Rini wrote:
Add a -l switch that takes an argument of either github or gitorious
and will make the
On 05/11/2011 09:15 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> Between myself and others, there are several outstanding proposals to
> modify the pull-request scripts. Patches have been sent, but nothing has
> been merged due to a lack of consensus. I thought I would summarize what
> I see to be the current weakness
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 13:15, Darren Hart wrote:
> 2) create-pull-request needs to facilitate the use of multiple
> repositories (Tom Rini)
>
> Some folks find gitorious or github work best for their use. It is
> also reasonable to want to use this script with independent layers.
> Tom pr
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 20:01, Tom Rini wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 12:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15:55, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> Add a -l switch that takes an argument of either github or gitorious
>>> and will make the cover letter have a fill-in-the-blank of where the
>>> c
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:17, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> This looks ok but could you please give more details in the patch about
> why its needed. Saul should be able to point you at the details of where
> that information is.
Sorry Richard but I didn't follow you. In my point of view the patch
des
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> >
>> > Thoughts/Comments?
>> >
>>
>> I would suggest to alter the process a bit and get rid of the scripts
>> completely. Patches
63 matches
Mail list logo
