On 14 February 2013 16:03, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> Just out of curiosity:
> - will systemd be the default?
> - will it be possible to still use/choose sysvinit (i.e. is sysvinit
> going away)?
No and yes.
> How does systemd fit in with busybox? My understanding is that busybox
> has its own init
Just out of curiosity:
- will systemd be the default?
- will it be possible to still use/choose sysvinit (i.e. is sysvinit
going away)?
How does systemd fit in with busybox? My understanding is that busybox
has its own init system. If someone enables/chooses systemd, does it
disable busybox's init
On 14 February 2013 14:02, Ian Geiser wrote:
> Hey, I noticed that systemd service files are going back into the oe-core
> layer and not always compatible with meta-oe. What is the official policy on
> systemd right now? Is it supposed to be confined to the meta-oe/meta-systemd
> layer? Or w
Hey, I noticed that systemd service files are going back into the oe-core layer
and not always compatible with meta-oe. What is the official policy on systemd
right now? Is it supposed to be confined to the meta-oe/meta-systemd layer?
Or what cases will they be pulled in and/or duplicated in
