On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Andreas Müller
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Koen Kooi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Op 21 apr. 2013, om 17:09 heeft Richard Purdie
>>> het volgende geschreven:
>>>
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 08:59 +
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Koen Kooi
> wrote:
>>
>> Op 21 apr. 2013, om 17:09 heeft Richard Purdie
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 08:59 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 16:00 heeft Koen Ko
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 21 apr. 2013, om 17:09 heeft Richard Purdie
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 08:59 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 16:00 heeft Koen Kooi het
>>> volgende geschreven:
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:37 he
Op 21 apr. 2013, om 17:09 heeft Richard Purdie
het volgende geschreven:
> On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 08:59 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 16:00 heeft Koen Kooi het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:37 heeft Koen Kooi het
>>> volgende geschreven:
>>> And it still
On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 08:59 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 16:00 heeft Koen Kooi het
> volgende geschreven:
> > Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:37 heeft Koen Kooi het
> > volgende geschreven:
> > And it still doesn't work :(
> >
> > root@beaglebone:~# systemctl status gdm -a
> > gdm.serv
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 16:00 heeft Koen Kooi het
volgende geschreven:
>
> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:37 heeft Koen Kooi het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>>
>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:13 heeft Koen Kooi het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>>>
>>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:03 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
>>>
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 16:00 heeft Koen Kooi het
volgende geschreven:
>
> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:37 heeft Koen Kooi het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>>
>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:13 heeft Koen Kooi het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>>>
>>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:03 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
>>>
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:37 heeft Koen Kooi het
volgende geschreven:
>
> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:13 heeft Koen Kooi het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>>
>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:03 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 19 April 2013 13:49, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Running t
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:13 heeft Koen Kooi het
volgende geschreven:
>
> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:03 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 19 April 2013 13:49, Koen Kooi wrote:
Running the postinstalls at first boot appear to hang because (and
that's just a feeling)
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 15:03 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
volgende geschreven:
> On 19 April 2013 13:49, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> Running the postinstalls at first boot appear to hang because (and
>>> that's just a feeling) gtk-icon-cache is run twice on target... which is
>>> time consuming.
>>
>> I kn
On 19 April 2013 13:49, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Running the postinstalls at first boot appear to hang because (and
>> that's just a feeling) gtk-icon-cache is run twice on target... which is
>> time consuming.
>
> I know it's time consuming, but it finished on 60-90 minutes with 1.3, I left
> it over
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 14:26 heeft Laurentiu Palcu het
volgende geschreven:
>
>
> On 04/19/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 13:23 heeft Laurentiu Palcu
>> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/19/2013 12:13 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 19 apr. 2013, o
On 04/19/2013 02:38 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 13:23 heeft Laurentiu Palcu
> het volgende geschreven:
>
>>
>>
>> On 04/19/2013 12:13 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>
>>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 10:52 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
>>> volgende geschreven:
>>>
On 19 April 2013 09:38, Bu
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 13:23 heeft Laurentiu Palcu het
volgende geschreven:
>
>
> On 04/19/2013 12:13 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 10:52 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
>> volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 19 April 2013 09:38, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 18 April 2013 19:45, Koen Ko
On 04/19/2013 12:13 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 19 apr. 2013, om 10:52 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 19 April 2013 09:38, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>> On 18 April 2013 19:45, Koen Kooi wrote:
[koen@rrMBP 1.0-r0]$ grep "configuration required on target"
temp/l
Op 19 apr. 2013, om 10:52 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
volgende geschreven:
> On 19 April 2013 09:38, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> On 18 April 2013 19:45, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> [koen@rrMBP 1.0-r0]$ grep "configuration required on target"
>>> temp/log.do_rootfs
>>> gdk-pixbuf-loader-png.postinst returne
On 19 April 2013 09:38, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 18 April 2013 19:45, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> [koen@rrMBP 1.0-r0]$ grep "configuration required on target"
>> temp/log.do_rootfs
>> gdk-pixbuf-loader-png.postinst returned 1, marking as unpacked only,
>> configuration required on target.
> ..
>
> This
On 18 April 2013 19:45, Koen Kooi wrote:
> [koen@rrMBP 1.0-r0]$ grep "configuration required on target"
> temp/log.do_rootfs
> gdk-pixbuf-loader-png.postinst returned 1, marking as unpacked only,
> configuration required on target.
...
This is "usual" for postinsts that are intercepted and hand
Op 18 apr. 2013, om 20:45 heeft Koen Kooi het
volgende geschreven:
>
> Op 17 apr. 2013, om 20:55 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 17 April 2013 19:27, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> I get a similar result here, but I have to rerun all postinsts with
>>> gconftool to make the
Op 17 apr. 2013, om 20:55 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
volgende geschreven:
> On 17 April 2013 19:27, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> I get a similar result here, but I have to rerun all postinsts with
>> gconftool to make the packages actually work. I'll update OE-core tomorrow
>> and try to get some more
On 17 April 2013 21:26, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> 3.5 minutes is still a long time, what packages does it run on the target?
>
> According to the do_rootfs logs, the gconftool-2 ones. This is a full gnome
> image with a complete desktop and gconftool is *very* slow.
Using gconf.bbclass? Those should
Op 17 apr. 2013, om 20:55 heeft "Burton, Ross" het
volgende geschreven:
> On 17 April 2013 19:27, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> I get a similar result here, but I have to rerun all postinsts with
>> gconftool to make the packages actually work. I'll update OE-core tomorrow
>> and try to get some more
On 17 April 2013 19:27, Koen Kooi wrote:
> I get a similar result here, but I have to rerun all postinsts with gconftool
> to make the packages actually work. I'll update OE-core tomorrow and try to
> get some more debug info. Systemctl says postinsts ran for 3 and a half
> minutes, a big impro
Op 17 apr. 2013, om 11:37 heeft Paul Eggleton
het volgende geschreven:
> On Wednesday 17 April 2013 11:03:30 Andreas Müller wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Paul Eggleton
>> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 16 April 2013 23:42:08 Khem Raj wrote:
On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Mülle
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 09:28 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 April 2013 23:42:08 Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Müller
> > wrote:
> > > sorry again me with another issue. I updated all layers from master
> > > few hours ago and built from scratch. On first b
On Wednesday 17 April 2013 07:57:13 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:28 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 April 2013 23:42:08 Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Müller
> >>
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> sorry again me with another issue. I updated all layers fro
On Apr 17, 2013, at 1:28 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 April 2013 23:42:08 Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Müller
>> wrote:
>>> sorry again me with another issue. I updated all layers from master
>>> few hours ago and built from scratch. On first boot with s
On Wednesday 17 April 2013 11:03:30 Andreas Müller wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 April 2013 23:42:08 Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Müller
> >>
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > sorry again me with another issue. I updated a
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:28:31AM +0200, Andreas Müller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry again me with another issue. I updated all layers from master
> few hours ago and built from scratch. On first boot with systemd
> postinst never finishes. I see only:
>
> [** } A start job is running for Run pending
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 April 2013 23:42:08 Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Müller
>> wrote:
>> > sorry again me with another issue. I updated all layers from master
>> > few hours ago and built from scratch. On first boot wi
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 23:42:08 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Müller
> wrote:
> > sorry again me with another issue. I updated all layers from master
> > few hours ago and built from scratch. On first boot with systemd
> > postinst never finishes. I see only:
> >
> > [
ran into same issue. I disabled post installs to run on boot
On Apr 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry again me with another issue. I updated all layers from master
> few hours ago and built from scratch. On first boot with systemd
> postinst never finishes. I see onl
Hi,
sorry again me with another issue. I updated all layers from master
few hours ago and built from scratch. On first boot with systemd
postinst never finishes. I see only:
[** } A start job is running for Run pending postinsts
and ** are moving around.
Does anybody else face this one?
Andre
33 matches
Mail list logo