On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:35:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>
> > On Aug 11, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >
> > So, I've been debugging the issue of oprofile rebuilding from one MACHINE to
> > another (causing PR issues, etc). I was able to trace it down to this line:
> >
> > EXTR
On 08/12/2015 05:26 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> So, I've been debugging the issue of oprofile rebuilding from one MACHINE to
> another (causing PR issues, etc). I was able to trace it down to this line:
Why not use perf instead of oprofile?
Philip
>
> EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-kernel=${STAGING
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>
> So, I've been debugging the issue of oprofile rebuilding from one MACHINE to
> another (causing PR issues, etc). I was able to trace it down to this line:
>
> EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-kernel=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} --without-x
> ac_cv_pr
So, I've been debugging the issue of oprofile rebuilding from one MACHINE to
another (causing PR issues, etc). I was able to trace it down to this line:
EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-kernel=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR} --without-x
ac_cv_prog_XSLTPROC="
And STAGING_KERNEL_DIR resolves to this:
STAGING_KERNE
