On 25 January 2016 at 18:04, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> As you know of "i'm being deleted" or "i'm being upgraded" - you have
> a pointer for this? To find a common solution: Do package managers
> share same behaviour here - or is there a common document package
> managers should comply with?
>
The
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 22 January 2016 at 09:50, Andreas Müller
> wrote:
>>
>> although opkg 0.2 -> 0.3 is long ago I noticed a change in behaviour
>> when updating a package:
>>
>> * 0.2.x did not call pkg_prerm
>> * 0.3.x calls pkg_prerm
>>
>> Is calling pkg
On 22 January 2016 at 09:50, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> although opkg 0.2 -> 0.3 is long ago I noticed a change in behaviour
> when updating a package:
>
> * 0.2.x did not call pkg_prerm
> * 0.3.x calls pkg_prerm
>
> Is calling pkg_prerm a valid behaviour when updating a package?
>
opkg is copying
Hi,
although opkg 0.2 -> 0.3 is long ago I noticed a change in behaviour
when updating a package:
* 0.2.x did not call pkg_prerm
* 0.3.x calls pkg_prerm
Is calling pkg_prerm a valid behaviour when updating a package?
Why I ask this:
systemd.bbclass does
* stop a service on pkg_prerm
* restart
