Re: [OE-core] libgcc_s.so not stripped

2013-03-04 Thread Khem Raj
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Enrico Scholz >> wrote: >> > >> > I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is >> > there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Unc

Re: [OE-core] libgcc_s.so not stripped

2013-03-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:25 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Enrico Scholz > wrote: > > > > I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is > > there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Uncompressed, this makes a > > difference of more than 1 MB. > >

Re: [OE-core] libgcc_s.so not stripped

2012-08-22 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is > there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Uncompressed, this makes a > difference of more than 1 MB. I dont see a reason to have debug info there. Symbol table probabl

[OE-core] libgcc_s.so not stripped

2012-08-22 Thread Enrico Scholz
Hi, I just noticed that libgcc_s.so.1 is not stripped in the .ipk. Is there any reason to keep the debug symbols? Uncompressed, this makes a difference of more than 1 MB. Enrico ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedde