On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 13:58 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Richard Purdie
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 16:51 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Richard Purdie
>> >>
On Thu, 2013-11-07 at 13:58 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 16:51 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Richard Purdie
> >> wrote:
> >> > packagegroups are allarch and shouldn't change d
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 16:51 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Richard Purdie
>> wrote:
>> > packagegroups are allarch and shouldn't change depending on the target
>> > or machine selected. In general they shoul
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 16:51 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> > packagegroups are allarch and shouldn't change depending on the target
> > or machine selected. In general they should have good stable namespaces
> > for their dependencies. As
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> packagegroups are allarch and shouldn't change depending on the target
> or machine selected. In general they should have good stable namespaces
> for their dependencies. As such we can exclude them from rebuilding when
> dependency checksums
packagegroups are allarch and shouldn't change depending on the target
or machine selected. In general they should have good stable namespaces
for their dependencies. As such we can exclude them from rebuilding when
dependency checksums change.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
---
diff --git a/meta/
