Hi Ross,
I did that.
current behavior:
$ devtool modify busybox
Initialising tasks: 100% |###|
Time: 0:00:00
Sstate summary: Wanted 14 Local 0 Mirrors 0 Missed 14 Current 6 (0%
match, 30% complete)
NOTE: Executing Tasks
...
your new behavior:
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @
> On 13 Oct 2022, at 09:23, Andrej Valek via lists.openembedded.org
> wrote:
> I had some time and made some more testing.
>
> Looks like, that the problematic commits are here:
> https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/41d7f1aa2cc9ef5dba4db38435402d4c9c0a63e1
> https://github
Hello again,
I had some time and made some more testing.
Looks like, that the problematic commits are here:
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/41d7f1aa2cc9ef5dba4db38435402d4c9c0a63e1
https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core/commit/6e2cbfc561dac89bf9183d24d90e52f7d9
Hello Richard,
Yes, but variants have set SDK_EXT_TYPE=full. Can't say about the pure
poky eSDK, but with our layers, size is different. Let's say 2/3 of the
"working" one.
Do you really need locked-sigs.inc from both variant? I guess, you only
need to know if some entries are missing and not the
On Tue, 2022-06-28 at 07:55 +, Valek, Andrej wrote:
> Hello Richard and Alex,
>
> Richard:
> We tried to revert the commits which you mentioned and it didn't work.
>
> Alex:
> Yes, is fully reproducible on latest master.
>
> bitbake core-image-minimal -c populate_sdk_ext
>
> eSDK installed
I'm seeing that this builds patch-native (to be able to patch busybox)
and its dependencies (quilt/autoconf/automake). If this has been
working differently before, bisecting to the point where it changed
would be very appreciated.
Alex
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 09:55, Valek, Andrej wrote:
>
> Hello
Hello Richard and Alex,
Richard:
We tried to revert the commits which you mentioned and it didn't work.
Alex:
Yes, is fully reproducible on latest master.
bitbake core-image-minimal -c populate_sdk_ext
eSDK installed via: poky-glibc-x86_64-core-image-minimal-cortexa15t2hf-
neon-qemuarm-toolchai
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 12:32 +, Valek, Andrej wrote:
> I have a question related to eSDK dependencies. We're using the dunfell
> branch were everything related to this eSDK topic works fine. Now we're
> in the transition phase to new LTS branch, where were we found one big
> difference between e
Can this behavior be reproduced using poky and no other layers?
Alex
On Mon 27. Jun 2022 at 15.33, Andrej Valek wrote:
> Hello Richard!
>
> I have a question related to eSDK dependencies. We're using the dunfell
> branch were everything related to this eSDK topic works fine. Now we're
> in the
Hello Richard!
I have a question related to eSDK dependencies. We're using the dunfell
branch were everything related to this eSDK topic works fine. Now we're
in the transition phase to new LTS branch, where were we found one big
difference between eSDKs.
The old variant (dunfell) includes all ap
10 matches
Mail list logo
