Re: [OE-core] dbus seems to be given debian naming convention, breaking another recipe

2017-02-20 Thread Burton, Ross
On 20 February 2017 at 15:53, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i'm still confused, then ... what is libnet-dbus-perl complaining > about? > You'll have to look at what libnet-dbus-perl is doing. Maybe the logic is broken and it thinks 1.10 < 1.3 (ascii compare would do that). Maybe you forgot a dbu

Re: [OE-core] dbus seems to be given debian naming convention, breaking another recipe

2017-02-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day > wrote: >   moving on, i whipped together a recipe for libnet-dbus-perl, tried > to build, and: > >   ... >   DBus >= 1.3.0 is required >   ... > > which is w

Re: [OE-core] dbus seems to be given debian naming convention, breaking another recipe

2017-02-20 Thread Christopher Larson
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > moving on, i whipped together a recipe for libnet-dbus-perl, tried > to build, and: > > ... > DBus >= 1.3.0 is required > ... > > which is weird since oe-core contains the recipe: > > meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus_1.10.14.bb > > b

[OE-core] dbus seems to be given debian naming convention, breaking another recipe

2017-02-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day
moving on, i whipped together a recipe for libnet-dbus-perl, tried to build, and: ... DBus >= 1.3.0 is required ... which is weird since oe-core contains the recipe: meta/recipes-core/dbus/dbus_1.10.14.bb but when i examined the deployed rpms: -rw-r--r--. 3 rpjday rpjday 163963 Feb