On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Peter Seebach
wrote:
>> Change the above to:
>> multilibs = data.getVar("MULTILIBS", True)
>> if multilibs:
>
> If someone has done:
>
> MULTILIBS = ""
>
> this then ends up being confused because pairs[0] of the single
> returned item is still "", and th
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:01:41 -0500
Mark Hatle wrote:
> split does a whitespace based split automatically, I'm used to
> seeing .split() everywhere. (I won't comment on the other similar
> split items)
Okay.
> > +validities = data.getVarFlags('TUNEVALID') or ""
> "validities"? that a ne
In general I like this.. see a few critiques below:
On 4/26/12 4:08 PM, Peter Seebach wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:38:05 -0500
Peter Seebach wrote:
This is a followup from some chat in #yocto and elsewhere.
Okay, some more followup.
While testing this, I kept burning myself on perfectly re
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:38:05 -0500
Peter Seebach wrote:
> This is a followup from some chat in #yocto and elsewhere.
Okay, some more followup.
While testing this, I kept burning myself on perfectly reasonable
things to get wrong while defining and using multilibs, so I wrote a
bunch of sanity ch
This is a followup from some chat in #yocto and elsewhere. To make a
long story short, some of the commercial vendors (like Wind River) tend
to ship prebuilt binaries for glibc, and want to require these binaries
to be used as-is (unless the user has done something special and is
building libc).
