On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:55:42PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Roman Khimov wrote:
> > В письме от 29 октября 2015 08:42:31 пользователь Khem Raj написал:
> >> 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream
> >
> > No opinion on this.
I agree, it
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Roman Khimov wrote:
> В письме от 29 октября 2015 08:42:31 пользователь Khem Raj написал:
>> 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream
>
> No opinion on this.
>
>> 2. Move musl support to OE-Core from meta-musl
>
> I would certainly suppor
On 10/29/2015 08:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to get everyone’s opinion on the libcs we maintain in OE-Core,
> as of now, we have
>
> glibc + cross localedef + kconfig patches which are left overs from eglibc
> days
> uclibc - which is more of less unmaintained
>
> Its a
В письме от 29 октября 2015 08:42:31 пользователь Khem Raj написал:
> 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream
No opinion on this.
> 2. Move musl support to OE-Core from meta-musl
I would certainly support this kind of for musl.
> 3. Drop uclibc or leave it in current
Hi All,
I would like to get everyone’s opinion on the libcs we maintain in OE-Core, as
of now, we have
glibc + cross localedef + kconfig patches which are left overs from eglibc days
uclibc - which is more of less unmaintained
Its a significant effort to keep forward porting the kconfig changes
