On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 13:17 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> (And RedHat based linux distributions don't have any concept of alternatives.
True...until about 10 years ago.
Sun Jan 27 2002 Erik Troan
- reimplemented update-alternatives as just alternatives
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitwe
On 03.04.2012 20:17, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 4/3/12 1:07 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> ...
> (And RedHat based linux distributions don't have any concept of alternatives.
> They generally decide which binary package will provide the functionality
> and that is the defacto standard for a given release. O
On 4/3/12 1:21 PM, Chris Larson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/3/12 1:07 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-04-03 12:03, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/3/12 12:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images?
When I asked this p
On 2012-04-03 12:17, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/3/12 1:07 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-04-03 12:03, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/3/12 12:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images?
When I asked this previously, I was told that rpm was used because
it has s
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 4/3/12 1:07 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-04-03 12:03, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4/3/12 12:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images?
When I asked this previously, I was
On 4/3/12 1:07 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-04-03 12:03, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/3/12 12:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images?
When I asked this previously, I was told that rpm was used because
it has superior dependency tracking. Fair enough
On 2012-04-03 12:03, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 4/3/12 12:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images?
When I asked this previously, I was told that rpm was used because
it has superior dependency tracking. Fair enough (I guess), but
then why is opkg requir
On Tuesday 03 April 2012 11:52:07 Gary Thomas wrote:
> Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images?
> When I asked this previously, I was told that rpm was used because
> it has superior dependency tracking. Fair enough (I guess), but
> then why is opkg required if I build an im
On 4/3/12 12:52 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images?
When I asked this previously, I was told that rpm was used because
it has superior dependency tracking. Fair enough (I guess), but
then why is opkg required if I build an image using
PACKAG
Why are both opkg-native and rpm-native needed to build images?
When I asked this previously, I was told that rpm was used because
it has superior dependency tracking. Fair enough (I guess), but
then why is opkg required if I build an image using
PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_rpm"
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
