Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-07 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 6 jul. 2011 om 18:53 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven: > On 07/01/2011 02:41 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:26 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: >> >>> >>> >>> 2011/7/1 Koen Kooi >>> >>> Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgen

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-06 Thread Anders Darander
* Tom Rini Tom Rini [07/06/11 07:53 PM]: > On 07/01/2011 02:41 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:26 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > >> 2011/7/1 Koen Kooi > >> > >> Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > >>> Good idea. > >>> Pe

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-06 Thread Tom Rini
On 07/01/2011 02:41 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:26 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > >> >> >> 2011/7/1 Koen Kooi >> >> Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: >> >>> >>> Good idea. >>> Personally I'd like to also bring footpri

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:53 +0200, Andrea Adami wrote: > Now, the detractors have argued that those flags would be a nightmare > for people packaging feeds, with no way for the package manager to > detect those different recipes with the same name. That does indeed come up frequently but I think t

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Andrea Adami
> Some worthwhile configuration can't be expressed in terms of high-level > distro features (i.e.: usb, bluetooth, alsa etc...).  What about "I want > SSL support, but NOT in library foo".  That case can't be covered by > distro feature 'ssl'. see http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Chris Elston
> > I'm proposing something along the lines of the following: > > This is actually along the lines of what I've been thinking too! Cool, I'm glad I'm not alone on this one :) > How about something like the syntax for the recipe: > > PACKAGECONFIG[ogg] = "--enable-ogg, --disable-ogg, libogg" > P

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 12:19 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Well, as far as I know if it is in DEPENDS it will implicitly end up > in RDEPENDS No, you've got it backwards. Items appearing in RDEPENDS are (to a first approximation) treated as if they are also in DEPENDS, but not the converse.

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2011/7/1 Koen Kooi > > Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:26 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > > > > > > > 2011/7/1 Koen Kooi > > > > Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > > > > > > > > Good idea. > > > Personally I'd like to also bring footprint into th

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:26 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > > > 2011/7/1 Koen Kooi > > Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > > > > > Good idea. > > Personally I'd like to also bring footprint into the equation. If a feature > > drags in

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
Oh by the way, and the message you might be see saying: This message may not have been sent by: fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com Learn more Report phishing This is really google not having their stuff properly configured. I'm sending email from their web client (https://mail.google.com/) And yes,

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2011/7/1 Koen Kooi > > Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > > > > > Good idea. > > Personally I'd like to also bring footprint into the equation. If a > feature drags in lots of additional packages, it is interesting to make it > configurable. > > My favouri

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:55 heeft Frans Meulenbroeks het volgende geschreven: > > > 2011/7/1 Richard Purdie > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:10 +0100, Chris Elston wrote: > > We're looking to base an embedded development on oe-core in the near > > future, and one of the things we must have is the abilit

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2011/7/1 Richard Purdie > On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:10 +0100, Chris Elston wrote: > > We're looking to base an embedded development on oe-core in the near > > future, and one of the things we must have is the ability to configure > > features in/out of recipes per distro. > > > > At the moment som

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-06-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:10 +0100, Chris Elston wrote: > We're looking to base an embedded development on oe-core in the near > future, and one of the things we must have is the ability to configure > features in/out of recipes per distro. > > At the moment some recipes have a configuration / set

[OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-06-30 Thread Chris Elston
We're looking to base an embedded development on oe-core in the near future, and one of the things we must have is the ability to configure features in/out of recipes per distro. At the moment some recipes have a configuration / set of dependencies baked in to the recipe. For example, gstreamer h