On 02/12/2015 18:04, "Martin Jansa" wrote:
My only concern is about migrating current database, do you know if the
migration will keep the database
>>I don't know, but I can find out.
I've been told that database migration will work from the version of
Patchwork OE is currently using t
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:59:17AM +, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
>
>
> On 02/12/2015 10:54, "openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org on
> behalf of Barros Pena, Belen"
> belen.barros.p...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >On 02/12/2015 08:17, "openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedd
On 02/12/2015 10:54, "openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org on
behalf of Barros Pena, Belen"
wrote:
>
>
>On 02/12/2015 08:17, "openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org on
>behalf of Martin Jansa" on behalf of martin.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:01:40
On 02/12/2015 08:17, "openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org on
behalf of Martin Jansa" wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:01:40PM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:47:20 Martin Jansa wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 07:49:50AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> > >
On Mon, 2015-11-30 at 10:19 -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 11/26/15 16:00, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > I'm also
> > trying to ensure that the patch validation is generic enough so it can live
> > in
> > OE-Core, and thus we can easily update and refine it over time in line with
> > the
> > cod
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 04:01:40PM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:47:20 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 07:49:50AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > Hi Trevor,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:19:35 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > > > On 11/26/15 16:00, Paul Eggle
On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 11:47:20 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 07:49:50AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > Hi Trevor,
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:19:35 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > > On 11/26/15 16:00, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > > I'm also
> > > > trying to ensure that the patch validat
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 07:49:50AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:19:35 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> > On 11/26/15 16:00, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > I'm also
> > > trying to ensure that the patch validation is generic enough so it can
> > > live in OE-Core, and thus
Hi Trevor,
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:19:35 Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 11/26/15 16:00, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > I'm also
> > trying to ensure that the patch validation is generic enough so it can
> > live in OE-Core, and thus we can easily update and refine it over time in
> > line with the code itsel
On 11/26/15 16:00, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> I'm also
> trying to ensure that the patch validation is generic enough so it can live
> in
> OE-Core, and thus we can easily update and refine it over time in line with
> the
> code itself as well as encourage submitters to use the script on their own
Op 26-11-15 om 22:00 schreef Paul Eggleton:
> Hi all,
>
> Over the past several years one of the regular complaints people have made
> about our project has been that patches sometimes take a long time to make it
> into master, and it's not always clear what the state of a patch is during
> tha
Hi Armin,
On Friday 27 November 2015 09:15:39 akuster808 wrote:
> On 11/26/2015 01:00 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > Over the past several years one of the regular complaints people have made
> > about our project has been that patches sometimes take a long time to make
> > it into master, and it's
Paul,
On 11/26/2015 01:00 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Thanks for taking the time to look into this.
> Over the past several years one of the regular complaints people have made
> about our project has been that patches sometimes take a long time to make it
> into master, and it's no
On 26 November 2015 at 21:00, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> Please let me know your thoughts on the above, most importantly on the
> patchwork upgrade, since most of this hinges on that; I don't believe we
> can
> practically base it on the version of Patchwork we are using now.
>
Yes, yes, and again y
Hi all,
Over the past several years one of the regular complaints people have made
about our project has been that patches sometimes take a long time to make it
into master, and it's not always clear what the state of a patch is during
that time. On the other side of things, maintainers are fin
15 matches
Mail list logo
