On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:24 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever
> > > reached a firm conclusion.
> > >
> > >
2011/7/1 Phil Blundell
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > > We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever
> > > reached a firm conclusion.
> > >
> > > Is everyone agreed that the PRIO
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:15 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever
> > reached a firm conclusion.
> >
> > Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any use
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:41 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever
> reached a firm conclusion.
>
> Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful
> purpose in oe-core and can/should be removed from the recipes
Op 1 jul 2011, om 11:41 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
> We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever
> reached a firm conclusion.
>
> Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful
> purpose in oe-core and can/should be removed f
We had some discussion of this a few weeks ago but I'm not sure it ever
reached a firm conclusion.
Is everyone agreed that the PRIORITY variable does not serve any useful
purpose in oe-core and can/should be removed from the recipes?
p.
___
Openembed
