On 21 March 2014 18:22, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> musl-libc hit version 1.0.0 yesterday and is starting to look good to
>> me. It's basically a really small but very functional libc that would
>> suit embedded environments very well as
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> musl-libc hit version 1.0.0 yesterday and is starting to look good to
> me. It's basically a really small but very functional libc that would
> suit embedded environments very well as an alternative to
> eglibc/uclibc. I'm personall
On 21 March 2014 13:10, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 21 March 2014 12:34, Paul Barker wrote:
>> I'm currently very busy between various projects so I don't have time
>> to hack together a musl-libc recipe myself but I should have time to
>> help test it.
>
> I saw that yesterday too and thought it co
On 21 March 2014 12:34, Paul Barker wrote:
> I'm currently very busy between various projects so I don't have time
> to hack together a musl-libc recipe myself but I should have time to
> help test it.
I saw that yesterday too and thought it could be interesting for
Yocto. I'm curious as to why
Hi all,
musl-libc hit version 1.0.0 yesterday and is starting to look good to
me. It's basically a really small but very functional libc that would
suit embedded environments very well as an alternative to
eglibc/uclibc. I'm personally very interested in using it in my
projects and I also think it
