On 4/10/17 8:19 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> First and foremost, yes a patch from Neal was mishandled. However, I
> think the dial went up to 11 on this one a bit too quickly.
>
> As far as I can tell Neal's attribution still appears in the
> 0001-Add-fallback-fopencookie-implementation.patch file.
On 04/10/2017 11:17 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
Nearly all the Free and Open Source Software work I do is in my
limited spare time (I don't do any FOSS work for a living), and it's
heartbreaking to see people take my work and re-attribute it to
themselves, or say things on my behalf that I certainly d
First and foremost, yes a patch from Neal was mishandled. However, I
think the dial went up to 11 on this one a bit too quickly.
As far as I can tell Neal's attribution still appears in the
0001-Add-fallback-fopencookie-implementation.patch file. All that
happened was that an extraneous "com>" was
Neal attempted to send this directly to the list, but he is not subscribed. For
an issue such as this, he also should not be required to subscribe to get this
corrected.
Forwarded Message
Subject: About misappropriation of one of my patches in OpenEmbedded
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 201
