Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-22 Thread Chris Larson
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: > On 2012年02月22日 00:57, Saul Wold wrote: >> >> On 02/19/2012 10:40 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: >>> >>> On 2012年02月18日 07:52, Saul Wold wrote: > > Hi Saul, > > I have implemented the most functions but srpm functions. I will complete > the

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-22 Thread Xiaofeng Yan
On 2012年02月22日 00:57, Saul Wold wrote: On 02/19/2012 10:40 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: On 2012年02月18日 07:52, Saul Wold wrote: Hi Saul, I have implemented the most functions but srpm functions. I will complete the left work(merge functions from sourcepkg, src_distribute to archiver.bbclass,

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-21 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/19/2012 10:40 PM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: On 2012年02月18日 07:52, Saul Wold wrote: Xiaofeng & Community: We had a chat with Chris Larson and Mark Hatle here at ELC. We focused this issue down to a fewer number of options that meet the needs of the licenses. Please review this and let us know

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-19 Thread Xiaofeng Yan
On 2012年02月18日 07:52, Saul Wold wrote: Xiaofeng & Community: We had a chat with Chris Larson and Mark Hatle here at ELC. We focused this issue down to a fewer number of options that meet the needs of the licenses. Please review this and let us know if there are any issues or concerns. H

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-17 Thread Saul Wold
Xiaofeng & Community: We had a chat with Chris Larson and Mark Hatle here at ELC. We focused this issue down to a fewer number of options that meet the needs of the licenses. Please review this and let us know if there are any issues or concerns. Best Practices: - Archive during build, w

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-15 Thread Xiaofeng Yan
On 2012年02月15日 23:23, Saul Wold wrote: Xiaofeng, I replied last night to your IRC, but was not sure if you saw it, I am adding it to this email. (11:05:36 PM) sgw: xiaofeng, you around? (11:08:22 PM) sgw: zlib is a bad example, since there are no patches! (11:08:38 PM) sgw: Let's use "at" si

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-15 Thread Saul Wold
Xiaofeng, I replied last night to your IRC, but was not sure if you saw it, I am adding it to this email. (11:05:36 PM) sgw: xiaofeng, you around? (11:08:22 PM) sgw: zlib is a bad example, since there are no patches! (11:08:38 PM) sgw: Let's use "at" since it is a simple recipe and has patch

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-14 Thread Saul Wold
On 02/13/2012 02:41 AM, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: Hi Saul, I have some issues when I writing design document. The following description is my understanding. I take package "zlib" for example . This is a progression list of what the source archives should include: 1 - Original Upstream Archive & Pa

Re: [OE-core] Fwd: [oe] Source Archiver Class

2012-02-13 Thread Xiaofeng Yan
Hi Saul, I have some issues when I writing design document. The following description is my understanding. I take package "zlib" for example . This is a progression list of what the source archives should include: 1 - Original Upstream Archive & Patches - 2 archives (tarballs) $ls zlib