Re: [OE-core] Busybox mdev INITSCRIPT_PARAMS gets lost

2013-04-10 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 04/10/2013 12:24 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: Hi Mike, On 10 April 2013 11:07, Burton, Ross wrote: This used to work just fine about a month ago, but it's suddenly broken. Has something changed in update-rc handling? Did you resolve this? We just noticed the same thing is happening to udev to

Re: [OE-core] Busybox mdev INITSCRIPT_PARAMS gets lost

2013-04-10 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi Mike, On 10 April 2013 11:07, Burton, Ross wrote: >> This used to work just fine about a month ago, but it's suddenly broken. Has >> something changed in update-rc handling? > > Did you resolve this? We just noticed the same thing is happening to > udev too. I'm digging into it now but any l

Re: [OE-core] Busybox mdev INITSCRIPT_PARAMS gets lost

2013-04-10 Thread Burton, Ross
On 19 March 2013 14:45, Mike Looijmans wrote: > In busybox.inc, the recipe says: > > INITSCRIPT_PARAMS_${PN}-mdev = "start 06 S ." > > Actually "06" is alreay wrong, it should be "03" just like udev uses. The > modules load at runlevel 04, so they'll fail to load correctly if they > require firmwa

[OE-core] Busybox mdev INITSCRIPT_PARAMS gets lost

2013-03-19 Thread Mike Looijmans
In busybox.inc, the recipe says: INITSCRIPT_PARAMS_${PN}-mdev = "start 06 S ." Actually "06" is alreay wrong, it should be "03" just like udev uses. The modules load at runlevel 04, so they'll fail to load correctly if they require firmware, soI amended this in a .bbappend to read INITSCRIPT