On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:02:36AM +0800, Lei Liu wrote:
> On 2013年11月13日 07:58, Phil Blundell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 12:30 +0800, Lei Liu wrote:
> >> +def get_optimization(d):
> >> +selected_optimization = d.getVar("SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION", True)
> >> +if base_contains("SELECTED_O
On 2013年11月13日 07:58, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 12:30 +0800, Lei Liu wrote:
>> +def get_optimization(d):
>> +selected_optimization = d.getVar("SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION", True)
>> +if base_contains("SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION", "-O0", "x", "", d) == "x":
>> +bb.note("libgc
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 12:30 +0800, Lei Liu wrote:
> +def get_optimization(d):
> +selected_optimization = d.getVar("SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION", True)
> +if base_contains("SELECTED_OPTIMIZATION", "-O0", "x", "", d) == "x":
> +bb.note("libgcc can't be built with -O0, -O2 will be used inste
Please fix up the comment to follow the guildlines on this patch and
your other one.
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
Sau!
On 11/10/2013 08:30 PM, Lei Liu wrote:
Link error happens for valgrind when linking unoptimized libgcc.
Libgcc requires symbol _Unwind
Link error happens for valgrind when linking unoptimized libgcc.
Libgcc requires symbol _Unwind_Resume defined in libgcc_eh which
in turn requires pulling in entire glibc. We can't make valgrind
link with glibc due to its design. So don't build libgcc without
optimizations, so that calls to _Unwi
