Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW09

2016-02-26 Thread Christopher Larson
This is the sort of case where it'd be nice if bitbake provided a plugin mechanism, pure python, no metadata parsing. Something to think about in the long term.. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:59 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 26 February 2016 at 20:16, Philip Balister wrote: > >> I must admit, I'm su

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW09

2016-02-26 Thread Burton, Ross
On 26 February 2016 at 20:16, Philip Balister wrote: > I must admit, I'm surprised this is tricky. I look forward to seeing > what needs doing. Hopefully, it shows me things I can avoid in my work. > The moral of the story is don't rename layers if you want to maintain a semblance of migration.

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW09

2016-02-26 Thread Philip Balister
On 02/26/2016 02:52 PM, Rudolf J Streif wrote: * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(. >>> >>> Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any >>> important lessons here?

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW09

2016-02-26 Thread Rudolf J Streif
> > > > > > * We're about to try and transition meta-yocto within meta-yocto to > > > > > > meta-poky. The amount of pain this is causing is horrible :(. > > > > Thanks for doing this. Can you summarize the pain? Are there any > > important lessons here? > > The key lesson is our current "mig