On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:21 AM, akuster808 wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/2015 08:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I would like to get everyone’s opinion on the libcs we maintain in OE-Core,
>>> as of now, we have
>>>
>>> glibc + cros
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:21 AM, akuster808 wrote:
>
>
> On 10/29/2015 08:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to get everyone’s opinion on the libcs we maintain in OE-Core,
>> as of now, we have
>>
>> glibc + cross localedef + kconfig patches which are left overs from eglibc
>>
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>
> On 10/29/15 3:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> On 10/29/15 10:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to get everyone’s opinion on the libcs we maintain in
OE-Core, as
On 10/29/15 3:14 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> On 10/29/15 10:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I would like to get everyone’s opinion on the libcs we maintain in OE-Core,
>>> as of now, we have
>>>
>>> glibc + cross localedef + kconfig patch
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 10/29/15 10:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would like to get everyone’s opinion on the libcs we maintain in OE-Core,
>> as of now, we have
>>
>> glibc + cross localedef + kconfig patches which are left overs from eglibc
>> days
>
On 10/29/15 10:42 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to get everyone’s opinion on the libcs we maintain in OE-Core,
> as of now, we have
>
> glibc + cross localedef + kconfig patches which are left overs from eglibc
> days
I do find the above useful -- include the kconfig part.
>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Dan McGregor
wrote:
> On 29 October 2015 at 10:45, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to make a proposal for 2.1 release where
>>>
>>> 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream
On 29 October 2015 at 10:45, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> I would like to make a proposal for 2.1 release where
>>
>> 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream
>> 2. Move musl support to OE-Core from meta-musl
>> 3. Drop u
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 08:42 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> I would like to make a proposal for 2.1 release where
>
> 1. Drop kconfig support in glibc and we become inline with upstream
> 2. Move musl support to OE-Core from meta-musl
> 3. Drop uclibc or leave it in current broken state, I would like to
