Re: [OE-core] [oe] RFC: libav vs. ffmpeg, redux

2015-07-10 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 9 July 2015 at 15:57, akuster808 wrote: > >> That make sense to me. Also libav has LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial" so the >> change which will simplify things too. >> > > Why isn't that the case for ffmpeg too? it remains same, commercial is

Re: [OE-core] [oe] RFC: libav vs. ffmpeg, redux

2015-07-09 Thread Burton, Ross
On 9 July 2015 at 15:57, akuster808 wrote: > That make sense to me. Also libav has LICENSE_FLAGS = "commercial" so the > change which will simplify things too. > Why isn't that the case for ffmpeg too? Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Opene

Re: [OE-core] [oe] RFC: libav vs. ffmpeg, redux

2015-07-09 Thread Burton, Ross
On 9 July 2015 at 11:35, Christian Ege wrote: > Another option could be supporting both. > I totally endorse having a layer that has the one that isn't in oe-core, but oe-core should pick one and support it properly. Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mai