Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] Glibc 2.23 and binutils 2.26

2016-01-26 Thread Khem Raj
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 9:11 PM, ChenQi wrote: > > On 01/17/2016 07:54 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >> Hi all >> >> upstream glibc and binutils release branches have been cut out and are being >> made ready for next release >> I have put together update patchset for both of them >> >> here are the branc

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] Glibc 2.23 and binutils 2.26

2016-01-26 Thread ChenQi
On 01/17/2016 07:54 PM, Khem Raj wrote: Hi all upstream glibc and binutils release branches have been cut out and are being made ready for next release I have put together update patchset for both of them here are the branches https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/tree/kraj/binutils-2.26

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] Glibc 2.23 and binutils 2.26

2016-01-21 Thread akuster808
On 01/17/2016 03:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi all > > upstream glibc and binutils release branches have been cut out and are being > made ready for next release > I have put together update patchset for both of them > > here are the branches > > https://github.com/kraj/openembedded-core/tree/k

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

2016-01-06 Thread Burton, Ross
On 6 January 2016 at 15:40, Khem Raj wrote: > fsl ppc build fails are due to glibc or some other reason > They're entirely down the their layer (broken fetch, broken recipes). Ross -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openemb

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

2016-01-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 6 January 2016 at 03:16, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> Same branch now has updated glibc patchset, if you have cycles please try >> once more. > > > Thanks Khem. When meta-fsl-ppc doesn't cause several failures in every run > I'll re-fire it so

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

2016-01-06 Thread Burton, Ross
On 6 January 2016 at 03:16, Khem Raj wrote: > Same branch now has updated glibc patchset, if you have cycles please try > once more. > Thanks Khem. When meta-fsl-ppc doesn't cause several failures in every run I'll re-fire it so we can actually get an all-green build! Ross --

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

2016-01-05 Thread Khem Raj
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:08:31 Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> >>> On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj wrote: I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines without a

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

2016-01-05 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 13:08:31 Khem Raj wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj wrote: > >> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines > >> without a single build failure and > >> runtime boot tested. > > > > I

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

2016-01-05 Thread Khem Raj
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj wrote: > >> I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines >> without a single build failure and >> runtime boot tested. >> > > I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to bu

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFT] glibc 2.23

2016-01-05 Thread Burton, Ross
On 4 January 2016 at 19:00, Khem Raj wrote: > I have done OE-Core only clean world builds for all Qemu machines > without a single build failure and > runtime boot tested. > I threw this at the autobuilder and glibc failed to build on one of the runs: http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Detai