On 11 March 2016 at 19:09, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> All them; we might use GNOME (MATE or other WM) and write just a GTK+3
> demo like app for test the desired stuff.
>
The full GNOME DE is *huge* and until the g-i branch is merged is literally
impossible to build. Something smaller like LXDE i
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 11 March 2016 at 18:53, Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
>>
>> Is matchbox still the way to go? To test OE-Core maybe a custom GTK3
>> app might be better.
>
>
> Do you mean desktop or window manager? Window managers are very non-trivial
> and
On 11 March 2016 at 18:53, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Is matchbox still the way to go? To test OE-Core maybe a custom GTK3
> app might be better.
>
Do you mean desktop or window manager? Window managers are very
non-trivial and matchbox is a known quantity, and the desktop is a custom
GTK+ 3 appl
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Jussi Kukkonen
wrote:
> Here's a snapshot of the Sato upgrade I've been working on (YOCTO
> #3169). It's based on Ross' work from 2.5 years back. The bigger
> changes currently live as my forks of the upstream projects (gtk3
> branches of various projects at http
On 11 March 2016 at 15:12, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:
> matchbox-theme-sato: Upgrade to JKU
>
As I was already asked about it: the commit message title is just a keyword
for me so I remember to modify them to whatever the upstream versions end
up as in the final patchset.
Jussi
> matchbox-desk
Here's a snapshot of the Sato upgrade I've been working on (YOCTO
#3169). It's based on Ross' work from 2.5 years back. The bigger
changes currently live as my forks of the upstream projects (gtk3
branches of various projects at https://github.com/jku), and the
patchset here modifies recipes to te
