On 25/09/2020 15.14, Rasmus Villemoes via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> You've convinced me that changing deltask to noexec is too
> wide-reaching, which means that I think just patch 1/4 should be
> applied. Please consider doing that.
Or rather, please apply the v2 I just sent to update the c
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 6:06 PM Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 22/09/2020 17.15, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This is all entirely untested, hence RFC. But if this doesn't work for
> > some reason, I think externalsrc.bbclass should grow some comments as
> > to why deltask is used instead of t
On 25/09/2020 13.43, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 12:31 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> Well, perhaps listtasks could be taught to say "[noexec flag set]" in
>> the description - currently it seems to be somewhat random whether a
>> class uses noexec or deltask.
>
> No. That wou
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 12:31 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Well, perhaps listtasks could be taught to say "[noexec flag set]" in
> the description - currently it seems to be somewhat random whether a
> class uses noexec or deltask.
No. That would just confuse things even more. That would hide do
On 25/09/2020 11.22, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 11:06 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On 22/09/2020 17.15, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>> This is all entirely untested, hence RFC. But if this doesn't work
>>> for
>>> some reason, I think externalsrc.bbclass should grow some commen
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 11:06 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 22/09/2020 17.15, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This is all entirely untested, hence RFC. But if this doesn't work
> > for
> > some reason, I think externalsrc.bbclass should grow some comments
> > as
> > to why deltask is used instead o
On 22/09/2020 17.15, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> This is all entirely untested, hence RFC. But if this doesn't work for
> some reason, I think externalsrc.bbclass should grow some comments as
> to why deltask is used instead of the noexec flag.
>
> Patch 4 is a revert of patch 1, but I did it that w
This is all entirely untested, hence RFC. But if this doesn't work for
some reason, I think externalsrc.bbclass should grow some comments as
to why deltask is used instead of the noexec flag.
Patch 4 is a revert of patch 1, but I did it that way to facilitate
backporting, in case patch 2 is too da
