Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] tclibc-musl: use musl's virtual/gettext implementation

2017-06-22 Thread André Draszik
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 12:27 +, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:27 AM Jussi Kukkonen > wrote: > > > $ bitbake -k core-image-minimal core-image-full-cmdline core-image-sato > > world > > That seems to fail with musl on the autobuilder with "Nothing RPROVIDES > > 'gettext-runtime' "

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] tclibc-musl: use musl's virtual/gettext implementation

2017-06-21 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 6:27 AM Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > $ bitbake -k core-image-minimal core-image-full-cmdline core-image-sato > world > That seems to fail with musl on the autobuilder with "Nothing RPROVIDES > 'gettext-runtime' " > > > https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-musl/builds/3

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] tclibc-musl: use musl's virtual/gettext implementation

2017-06-21 Thread Jussi Kukkonen
$ bitbake -k core-image-minimal core-image-full-cmdline core-image-sato world That seems to fail with musl on the autobuilder with "Nothing RPROVIDES 'gettext-runtime' " https://autobuilder.yocto.io/builders/nightly-musl/builds/313/steps/BuildImages/logs/stdio Cheers, Jussi On 19 June 2017 at 13

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] tclibc-musl: use musl's virtual/gettext implementation

2017-06-19 Thread Khem Raj
On Monday, June 19, 2017, André Draszik wrote: > From: André Draszik > > > musl implements the GNU gettext API version 1 and 2 > http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/04/16/3 > > Generally, there should be no need need for the > actual GNU/gettext in systems using musl, so with > this change

[OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] tclibc-musl: use musl's virtual/gettext implementation

2017-06-19 Thread André Draszik
From: André Draszik musl implements the GNU gettext API version 1 and 2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2015/04/16/3 Generally, there should be no need need for the actual GNU/gettext in systems using musl, so with this change systems using musl can avoid a needless dependency on a GPLv3+ t