On Mon, 2024-04-29 at 17:21 +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> On 4/25/24 at 22:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > At least at a first read and without running it, this does look like a
> > reasonable direction. I suspect that anyone else looking at this would
> > have a lot of ques
Hi Richard,
Many thanks for your feedback.
I started by implementing Alex Kanavin's suggestions, which are a little
more specific to get started ;-)
On 4/25/24 at 22:40, Richard Purdie wrote:
Hi Michael,
At least at a first read and without running it, this does look like a
reasonable direct
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 17:46, Michael Opdenacker via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> +++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/opkg_sysupgrade.py
This should perhaps go to meta-selftest/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/ as it
needs special setup via selftest, and not useful in standalone '-c
testimage' runs.
> +
Hi Michael,
At least at a first read and without running it, this does look like a
reasonable direction. I suspect that anyone else looking at this would
have a lot of questions about why we'd do it this way but given the
various constraints, it does make sense to me.
What we do need to think abo
From: Michael Opdenacker
New oe-selftest and associated "testimage" test to check that generated
package feeds can be used to update the latest image built
by the Yocto Project autobuilder.
Currently, only the "core-image-full-cmdline" image with IPK packages
and the "poky-altcfg" distro is supp