Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-09 Thread Jose Perez Carranza
Thank you Alex ! I will work on a patch with your approach On 06/09/2017 04:22 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: On 06/08/2017 07:35 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: I haven't been able to reproduce the installroot failure, works fine here. The installroot issue is most likely due to dnf architecture

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-09 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 06/08/2017 07:35 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: I haven't been able to reproduce the installroot failure, works fine here. The installroot issue is most likely due to dnf architectures not being properly configured (which causes breakage when the architecture is not one of the standard ones

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-08 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 06/07/2017 08:31 PM, Jose Perez Carranza wrote: When I tried this test image was built without using states hence "busybox*.rpm" and "curl*.rpm"where present under "tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64" hence the repo i taking tha packages form there to add them to repo and used on the image, but when usin

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-08 Thread Jose Perez Carranza
On 06/08/2017 07:49 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: On 06/08/2017 03:49 PM, Jose Perez Carranza wrote: 1. bitbake core-image-sato using shared states (I'm using local sstates) When you do this, tmp/deploy/rpm should get re-populated with rpm packages, regardless of whether they're taken from

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-08 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 06/08/2017 03:49 PM, Jose Perez Carranza wrote: 1. bitbake core-image-sato using shared states (I'm using local sstates) When you do this, tmp/deploy/rpm should get re-populated with rpm packages, regardless of whether they're taken from sstate, or rebuilt. Can you check why this does no

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-08 Thread Jose Perez Carranza
On 06/08/2017 06:31 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: On 06/07/2017 08:31 PM, Jose Perez Carranza wrote: When I tried this test image was built without using states hence "busybox*.rpm" and "curl*.rpm"where present under "tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64" hence the repo i taking tha packages form there to a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-08 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 06/07/2017 08:31 PM, Jose Perez Carranza wrote: When I tried this test image was built without using states hence "busybox*.rpm" and "curl*.rpm"where present under "tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64" hence the repo i taking tha packages form there to add them to repo and used on the image, but when usin

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-07 Thread Jose Perez Carranza
When I tried this test image was built without using states hence "busybox*.rpm" and "curl*.rpm"where present under "tmp/deploy/rpm/core2_64" hence the repo i taking tha packages form there to add them to repo and used on the image, but when using sstates those packages are not being built so a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-06-07 Thread Burton, Ross
On 15 May 2017 at 14:50, wrote: > Add test cases to test “exclude” and “installroot“ options, also modify > the logic of filtering packages on the feed to have all the packages > needed by the tests. > Fails all over the autobuilder, for example: http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/14

[OE-core] [PATCH v3] runtime/dnf: Add new dnf test cases

2017-05-15 Thread jose . perez . carranza
From: Jose Perez Carranza Add test cases to test “exclude” and “installroot“ options, also modify the logic of filtering packages on the feed to have all the packages needed by the tests. [YOCTO #10744] Signed-off-by: Jose Perez Carranza --- meta/classes/testimage.bbclass | 11 ---