Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/3] postinst fixes for opgk/dpkg

2018-06-14 Thread Alexander Kanavin
No need to be nervous. The patch will make it in; patches do not get quietly rejected. If it hasn't showed up yet, it's most likely because the patch will be tested on the autobuilder in a separate set from the 'regular patches', or (yes, this happens) it has slipped through the cracks. In that cas

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/3] postinst fixes for opgk/dpkg

2018-06-14 Thread Stefan Agner
On 04.06.2018 18:18, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 06/04/2018 07:06 PM, Stefan Agner wrote: > >> Anything holding us back merging this changes? > > Please read the Yocto project status mail: > > " · Patch review/merging was slow over the past week due to > Ross being on vacation and chan

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/3] postinst fixes for opgk/dpkg

2018-06-04 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On 06/04/2018 07:06 PM, Stefan Agner wrote: Anything holding us back merging this changes? Please read the Yocto project status mail: " · Patch review/merging was slow over the past week due to Ross being on vacation and changes in Richard’s employment/hardware situation but at leas

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/3] postinst fixes for opgk/dpkg

2018-06-04 Thread Stefan Agner
On 16.05.2018 11:13, Stefan Agner wrote: > From: Stefan Agner > > Hi, > > This follows up on the discussion a while ago: > https://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org/msg104996.html > > Patch 1 is rather simple and really fixes the main issue. The patch > by itself has

[OE-core] [PATCH v2 0/3] postinst fixes for opgk/dpkg

2018-05-16 Thread Stefan Agner
From: Stefan Agner Hi, This follows up on the discussion a while ago: https://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org/msg104996.html Patch 1 is rather simple and really fixes the main issue. The patch by itself has been tested with the relevant self test and passes. Patch