On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 18:54 +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> I see. You are right here. I admit I don't fully understand if it's
> generally okay for -native recipes to look around in (and later use)
> host include directories like that, as we're striving towards
> reproducible builds, and thi
On 05/29/2017 04:06 PM, Max Krummenacher wrote:
+- # check if rpm contains a bundled berkeley db
+- CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(rpm/db.h HAVE_RPM_DB_H)
++ set(HAVE_RPM_DB_H 0)
Have you looked into what CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE does, and whether it can be
fixed? I'd like to hear about your findings.
Yes,
2017-05-29 15:00 GMT+02:00 Max Krummenacher :
> 2017-05-29 12:50 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kanavin
> :
>> On 05/26/2017 11:35 PM, Max Krummenacher wrote:
>>>
>>> +- # check if rpm contains a bundled berkeley db
>>> +- CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(rpm/db.h HAVE_RPM_DB_H)
>>> ++ set(HAVE_RPM_DB_H 0)
>>
>>
>> Have
2017-05-29 12:50 GMT+02:00 Alexander Kanavin
:
> On 05/26/2017 11:35 PM, Max Krummenacher wrote:
>>
>> +- # check if rpm contains a bundled berkeley db
>> +- CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(rpm/db.h HAVE_RPM_DB_H)
>> ++ set(HAVE_RPM_DB_H 0)
>
>
> Have you looked into what CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE does, and whether
On 05/26/2017 11:35 PM, Max Krummenacher wrote:
+- # check if rpm contains a bundled berkeley db
+- CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(rpm/db.h HAVE_RPM_DB_H)
++ set(HAVE_RPM_DB_H 0)
Have you looked into what CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE does, and whether it can be
fixed? I'd like to hear about your findings.
Alex
With rpm v4 in openembedded but on a host with existing /usr/include/rpm/db.h
the native build fails to compile.
Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher
---
...01-don-t-pick-up-bundled-db-from-host-rpm.patch | 43 ++
meta/recipes-extended/libsolv/libsolv_0.6.27.bb| 3 +-
2 files
On 05/23/2017 12:32 AM, Max Krummenacher wrote:
Sorry Max, this is actually worse than the first version. HAVE_RPM_DB_H
has to accurately reflect the presence or absence of the header, as that
header is later included or not included depending on that. You cannot
set it based on checking some lib
Hi Alex
Am Montag, den 22.05.2017, 16:08 +0300 schrieb Alexander Kanavin:
> On 05/19/2017 06:48 PM, Max Krummenacher wrote:
> > + # check if rpm contains a bundled berkeley db
> > +- CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(rpm/db.h HAVE_RPM_DB_H)
> > ++ CHECK_LIBRARY_EXISTS(rpm.so db_create_rpmdb "" HAVE_RPM_DB_H)
On 05/19/2017 06:48 PM, Max Krummenacher wrote:
+ # check if rpm contains a bundled berkeley db
+- CHECK_INCLUDE_FILE(rpm/db.h HAVE_RPM_DB_H)
++ CHECK_LIBRARY_EXISTS(rpm.so db_create_rpmdb "" HAVE_RPM_DB_H)
Sorry Max, this is actually worse than the first version. HAVE_RPM_DB_H
has to accu
Am Freitag, den 19.05.2017, 16:51 +0100 schrieb Burton, Ross:
> On 19 May 2017 at 16:48, Max Krummenacher wrote:
>
> > +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [oe build specific]
> >
>
> Is this really inappropriate? We're finding a bug in the build system but
> that doesn't mean we're the cause of th
On 19 May 2017 at 16:48, Max Krummenacher wrote:
> +Upstream-Status: Inappropriate [oe build specific]
>
Is this really inappropriate? We're finding a bug in the build system but
that doesn't mean we're the cause of the breakage.
Ross
--
___
Openemb
With rpm v4 in openembedded but on a host with existing /usr/include/rpm/db.h
the native build fails to compile.
Signed-off-by: Max Krummenacher
---
...01-don-t-pick-up-bundled-db-from-host-rpm.patch | 51 ++
meta/recipes-extended/libsolv/libsolv_0.6.26.bb| 3 +-
2 files
12 matches
Mail list logo