Hi Pierre-Jean
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:27 AM TEXIER Pierre-Jean wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Le jeu. 30 août 2018 à 07:58, Alex Kiernan a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:59 PM Pierre-Jean Texier
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The DT specifications demands a unit-address of a node name to match the
Hi Alex,
Le jeu. 30 août 2018 à 07:58, Alex Kiernan a
écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:59 PM Pierre-Jean Texier
> wrote:
> >
> > The DT specifications demands a unit-address of a node name to match the
> "reg"
> > property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is
> >
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:59 PM Pierre-Jean Texier
wrote:
>
> The DT specifications demands a unit-address of a node name to match the "reg"
> property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is
> not the case.
>
> Fixes the following warnings:
>
> | : Warning (unit_address_v
The DT specifications demands a unit-address of a node name to match the "reg"
property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is
not the case.
Fixes the following warnings:
| : Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /images/kernel@1 has a unit
name, but no reg property
| : Wa
