Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3] expect: Add recipe

2013-11-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 10:01 +, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Saturday 02 November 2013 11:22:07 Saul Wold wrote: > > > +DEPENDS = "tcl" > > > +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "tcl" > > > > You don't need an RDEPENDS_${PN} if it matches with the DEPENDS > > For the sake of others reading, it's not as simple as t

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3] expect: Add recipe

2013-11-04 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Saturday 02 November 2013 11:22:07 Saul Wold wrote: > > +DEPENDS = "tcl" > > +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "tcl" > > You don't need an RDEPENDS_${PN} if it matches with the DEPENDS For the sake of others reading, it's not as simple as that. DEPENDS is for build-time dependencies, RDEPENDS is for runtime

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3] expect: Add recipe

2013-11-02 Thread Saul Wold
The recipe itself needs some work. See below Sau! On 11/01/2013 07:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote: From: Mihaela Sendrea Nedeed for gcc-runtime tests. Fixed build on multilib and add patch to remove !/depot/path/expect -f which caused rpm to puke on rfs generation Signed-off-by: Mihaela Sendrea

[OE-core] [PATCH V3] expect: Add recipe

2013-11-01 Thread Khem Raj
From: Mihaela Sendrea Nedeed for gcc-runtime tests. Fixed build on multilib and add patch to remove !/depot/path/expect -f which caused rpm to puke on rfs generation Signed-off-by: Mihaela Sendrea Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../expect/expect/0001-configure.in.patch | 108 ++