On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 07:09 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 6/6/11 5:46 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > PRIORITY does seem a bit of a pointless variable in the default metadata
> > and I'm borderline in favour of dropping it and leaving it to any
> > distros who want to use it, maybe sharing an include
On 6/6/11 5:46 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:00 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 21:49 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
>>> SECTION = "base"
>>> +PRIORITY = "optional"
>>
>> Seeing this sort of thing makes me wonder whether SECTION and PRIORITY
>> actually belo
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 09:00 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 21:49 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
> > SECTION = "base"
> > +PRIORITY = "optional"
>
> Seeing this sort of thing makes me wonder whether SECTION and PRIORITY
> actually belong in the core metadata at all. It seems as t
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 21:49 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
> SECTION = "base"
> +PRIORITY = "optional"
Seeing this sort of thing makes me wonder whether SECTION and PRIORITY
actually belong in the core metadata at all. It seems as though the
determination of what exactly is "standard" vs "optional"
Signed-off-by: Scott Garman
---
...tive_1.25.bb => tar-replacement-native_1.26.bb} |0
meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar.inc |1 +
meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar_1.25.bb |9 -
meta/recipes-extended/tar/tar_1.26.bb |9 +
4 files
