On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 09:34 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Apr 26, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Tristan Van Berkom > codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 13:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > > > On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
> > > > > > > codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> On Apr 26, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 13:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Tristan Van Berkom >> codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> We fail to build webkit on aarch64 due to this binutils bug:
>>>
>>> https://sourceware.or
On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 13:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Tristan Van Berkom > codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > We fail to build webkit on aarch64 due to this binutils bug:
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
> >
> > Applying patch which fixe
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
> wrote:
>
> We fail to build webkit on aarch64 due to this binutils bug:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
>
> Applying patch which fixes this, stripped out changelog entry
> from patch to make it apply without error
We fail to build webkit on aarch64 due to this binutils bug:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
Applying patch which fixes this, stripped out changelog entry
from patch to make it apply without error.
---
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc | 1 +
...plying